SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Telangana) 182

SUREPALLI NANDA
S. Amba Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Government of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Vivek Jain.
For the Respondent: E. Madan Mohan Rao.

ORDER :

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and respondents.

2. This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking writ of Mandamus declaring the notifications issued under Section 4(1) and Section 6(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, dated 19.03.1994 and Award dated 01.02.2008 in proceedings No. LA/113/2004 issued by the respondents and all consequential proceedings as being illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional.

3. The case of the petitioner is that he is the owner of land admeasuring Ac. 0.08 ¾ guntas in Survey No. 134/2 and Ac. 0-15 guntas in Survey No. 141 of Uppal Bhagat Village, Uppal Mandal, R.R. District and that the petitioner also purchased Ac. 0.10 guntas of land in Survey No. 133 under agreement of sale, dated 23.06.2003. Due to impugned land acquisition proceedings, the payment of total sale consideration under agreement of sale is deferred. The total extent of Ac. 7.6 ¼ gts in Uppal Bagath Village, Uppal Mandal, R.R. District including the petitioners alone referred lands were notified for acquisition for the purpose of construction of sewerage treatment plant (STP) at Nalla Cheruvu under Section 4(1) and Section 6 of the L.A. Act,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top