P. NAVEEN RAO, G. RADHA RANI
Mohammed Mujtaba Ali S/o. Late Dr. Mohammed Quasim Ali – Appellant
Versus
Mohammed Murtaza Ali, S/o. Late Dr. Mohammed Quasim Ali – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
G. Radha Rani , J.
This appeal is filed by the appellants-defendants No.6 and 8 aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 15.06.2016 passed in O.S. No.19 of 2003 by the IX Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad.
2. The parties are hereinafter referred to as arrayed before the trial Court.
3. The plaintiff filed a suit for partition and separate possession as party-in-person submitting that his father late Dr.Mohd. Quasim Ali was a retired Civil Surgeon, he expired on 28.03.1989. His father was the owner and possessor of properties bearing MCH Nos.13-3-994/1, situated at Malakpet Hyderabad, described as schedule ‘A’ properties and properties bearing MCH No.3-2-739 to 3-2-744, situated at Chappal Bazar, Hyderabad, described as ‘B’ schedule properties in the plaint, leaving behind him, his wife Smt. Tayyaba Begum, the plaintiff and the defendants. Their mother Smt. Tayyaba Begum also passed away on 25.02.1994. During his lifetime, the father of the plaintiff permitted the 2nd defendant to collect the rents from the tenants in respect of ‘B’ schedule properties situated at Chappal Bazar and to hand over the said rents to him. Even after the demise of Dr. Mohd.Quasi
Abdul Majid Kha s/o Mahebubkha vs. Mahmudabi w/o Bahadurkha
Abdul Rahim and Others v. Sk. Abdul Zabar and Others
Deepa Dua v. Tejinder Kumar Muteneja
Hafeeza Bibi and Ors. v. Shaikh Farid (dead) per LRs and Ors. AIR 2011 SC 1695
Ilahi Samsuddin v Jaitunbi Maqbul 1994 SCC (5) 476
Kanak Jain and others v. Chakresh Kumar Jain
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.