Back
SUREPALLI NANDA
R. Jaya Lakshmi – Appellant
Versus
State of TS. , Agre. , Hyderabad – Respondent
ORDER :
Heard the learned Senior counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the respondents.
2. It is represented by both the learned counsel for the petitioners and also the counsel for the respondents that the matter in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court dated 27.07.2022 passed in W.P.No.20859 of 2021 and the present writ petition may also be disposed of in the same lines.
3. Perused the record.
4. The reasoning given in rejecting the petitioner’s request for proving employment on compassionate grounds in various letters issued to the petitioner read as under :
(a) Lr No.6126/Agri.III(1)/2011-3, dated 25.04.2012 reads as under:
Married daughters are entitled to compassionate appointment on par with sons, as marital status does not negate their familial ties or dependency.
If the marital status of a son does not make any difference in Law to his entitlement for seeking appointment on compassionate grounds, the marital status of a daughter should make no difference, as ....
Married daughters are entitled to compassionate appointment, and discrimination based on marital status violates Articles 14 and 15 of the Constitution.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
