JUDGMENT :

HIMA KOHLI, J.

1. The appellant is aggrieved by an order dated 11.11.2020 passed by the learned Single Judge whereunder, I.A.No. 2 of 2020 filed by her in W.P.No. 18859 of 2020 has been dismissed and the earlier interim order passed on 21.10.2020 directing status quo in respect of allotment of the subject Retail Outlet (RO) for a period of two weeks, has been vacated.

2. Learned counsel for the appellant has drawn the attention of this Court to the letter dated 06.08.2020 issued by the respondent No. 2 to the appellant with reference to her application for awarding the RO dealership and calling upon her to furnish three documents on or before 26.08.2020. The appellant was cautioned that in case she fails to submit the three documents in question within the stipulated timeline, her candidature would be liable to be rejected without any further notice. Besides the above, the respondent No. 2 has also referred to the rectified documents submitted by the appellant in respect of the subject land offered by her and stated as follows:

“In case the rectified documents pertaining to the land offered are not submitted but other documents are submitted, your candidature may get conside