SUREPALLI NANDA
Vadala Venkanna – Appellant
Versus
TSRTC – Respondent
ORDER :
Heard the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner and the Learned standing counsel appearing for the Respondents/RTC.
2. This Writ Petition is filed to issue Writ or order more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction on the part of the respondents in not paying the leave encashment of 300 days during the span of 20.03.1980 to 31.05.21018 and the petitioner retired from service on 31.5.2018 as Junior Assistant under the control of the 3rd Respondent and the petitioner is entitled for an amount of Rs.5,30,700/- along with accrued interest of 9% per annum for delayed payment of retirement benefits and consequently direct the respondents to pay the leave encashment for 300 days for an amount of Rs.5,30,700/- along with accrued interest of 9% per annum from time to time for delayed payment to the petitioner till the date of realization.
3. The Case of the Petitioner, in brief, is as follows:
a. The petitioner was initially appointed as Office boy on 20.3.1980 and subsequently worked as Record Tracer and later worked as Routine clerk wherein the petit
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.