IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
Surepalli Nanda, J.
Kantilal - Petitioner
Versus
The State of Telangana and others - Respondents
Writ Petition No.41 of 2023
Decided On : 09-03-2023
Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 14, 19(1)g, 21 - Food Safety and Standard Act, 2006 - Section 42, 46 (4) - FSS Rules, 2011 - Rule 2.4.2(6) and 2.5.6 - Food analysis - Misbranding product - To issue a writ, order in nature of Writ of mandamus by declaring action of respondent Nos.1 to 3 in alleging misbranding product as absolutely illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violative and consequently direct Respondent No.1 to Respondent No.3 to set aside report of Food analysis - Held, Affidavit filed by respondent No.2 clearly indicates that time taken by respondent No.3 from date of receiving sample to date of sending report is 17 days and as a result, Section 42(2) of Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006, admittedly is violated in present case - As borne on record respondent No.3, violated mandatory requirements contemplated under Section 42 of Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 Court has no other option but to hold that very issuance of letter under Rule 2.4.2(6) and 2.5.6 of FSS Rules, 2011 Read with Section 46 (4) of FSS Act, 2006 to petitioners is totally in violation of Section 42 (2) of Food Safety and Standards Act since time gap taken by 3rd respondent from date of receiving sample to date of signing report, is seventeen days and not fourteen days as mandated under law - Food analysis report for growth of Kamco Kaju Malai bearing code in relation to Petitioner is set aside - Petition allowed.
ORDER :
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Government Pleader for Medical and Health.
2. The petitioner approached the Court seeking the prayer which is as follows:
3. The case of the petitioners, in brief, is as follows:
a) The petitioner is having license under the Food Safety and Standard Act, 2006 and renewed the same from time to time. b) M/s Superness Food Private Limited is one of the manufacturer whose products are also sold by the petitioner on retail basis. The 2nd respondent visited the shop and lifted four sealed boxes of Kamco Kaju Malai Milk and cashew chocolate bar from the shop of the petitioner and demanded to show food license, GST certificate, Aadhar Card and took signs of the petitioner on few papers. The sample collected on 10.11.2021 was sent to food analysis and food Analyst report dated 06.11.2021.
c) The Food Analysis report analyzed by the 3rd respondent reflects that the 2nd respondent sent the sample on 13.10.2021 whereas the analysis has commenced analyzing on 21.10.2021 and has completed the analysis on 26.10.2021 whereas the report is signed on 06.11.2021. d) The petitioner purchased the goods as per license. The inaction of respondents 1 to 3 is illegal and arbitrary. Hence, this writ petition.
PERUSED THE RECORD
4. The impugned report of Food analysis in report number 627/2021-22, dated 06-11-2021 in relation to the petitioner from a sample of Kamco Kaju Malai Malik and cashew chocolate bar bearing code No.011/14/01660/GHMC/2021 reads as under:
The condition of seals on the container and the outer covering on receipt was as follows:
The seals on the sample are intact and identical with the specimen impression of seal sent separately.
I found the sample to be Sweets & Confectionery (Category of the sample) falling under Regulation No.2.7.4 of Food Safety & Standards (Food Products Standards and Food additives) Regulations, 2011. The sample was in a condition fit for analysis and has been analysed on 20.10.2021/26.10.2021(date of starting and completion of analysis) and the result of its analysis is given below.
Analysis Report:-
1. Sample Description:- Sample received in a sealed & labelled packet kept in a plastic container.
2. Physical Appearance:-Cream coloured bar.
3. Label:- Kamco Kaju Malai Milk & Cashew Chocolate Bar,
Net wt:6.5gm, B.No.A-07,
Pkd: July 2021.
Best before 9 months.
FSSAI License number:11416850000107 with Logo.
Ingredients: Sugar, partially hydrogenated vegetable fat, Milk solids, Cashew, permitted emulsifiers & Stabilizing agents (E 322, E476) and salt. Mfd by: Superness Food Pvt.Ltd., SKJ Compound, Losadiya mori Dewas Naka, Indore, M.P., India.
| Sl. No | Quality Characteristics | Name of Method of Test | Result | Prescribed Standards as per 2.7.4 a) Food Safety and Standards (Food Products Standards & Food additives) Regulations 2011 b) As per label declaration for proprietary food © As per |
Prosecution under the Food Safety and Standards Act requires a confirming report from the Referral Laboratory; divergence in findings precludes legal action.
The court established that an offence under the Food Safety and Standards Act is committed upon receipt of the food analyst's report, and any prosecution must adhere to mandatory timelines; failure t....
Seizure of sub-standard and unsafe skimmed milk – Offence under FSS Act can be stated to have been committed on the date when report of Food Analyst indicating that sample of food is unsafe or sub-st....
: Technical grounds are not sufficient to quash criminal proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.