K. LAKSHMAN
Prattipati Srinivasa Rao – Appellant
Versus
Shriram City Union Finance Limited – Respondent
ORDER :
Heard Sri Nageshwar Rao Pujari, learned counsel for the petitioners in both the revisions and Sri N.Srikanth Goud, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.1. Perused the record.
2. Questioning the order dated 24.08.2022 in E.P.No.29 of 2021 in ARB No.180 of 2020 passed by learned V Additional District Judge, at Miryalaguda, the petitioners herein in both the revisions/J.Drs. 2 and 3 therein have filed the aforesaid revisions.
Facts of the case:-
3. On the application filed by 1st respondent, an award dated 06.01.2021 passed in arbitration application vide ARB No.180/2020 under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, the Act’), against the petitioners and Smt.Prathipati Shirisha (J.Dr.No.1). They have not filed any application under Section 34 of the Act challenging the said award and it attained finality. Therefore, 1st respondent/Decreeholder had filed an Execution Petition vide E.P.No.29 of 2021 under Section 36 of the Act seeking execution of the said award. Vide order dated 24.08.2022, learned V Additional District Judge at Miryalaguda has passed an order of attachment of salary of both the petitioners to an extent of Rs.4,10,258/- due to the Decreeholder und
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.