SUREPALLI NANDA
Ravula Rohith – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
ORDER :
Heard Mr Mohd. Azhar, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Education appearing on behalf of the 1st respondent, learned Government Pleader for Forest appearing on behalf of the 2nd respondent and the learned Government Pleader for Services-I.
2. This Writ Petition is filed to issue a Writ of Mandamus declaring the actions of the respondent No. 3, in rusticating the petitioner by issuing rustication notice vide Rc. No. 166/2019/A4(i) dated 14.07.2023 until further orders from Ph.d Forestry (Department: Siviculture and Agro forestry) without calling for any explanation or show cause as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, excessive, against principles of natural justice, violative of articles 14, 21 of constitution of India and consequently set aside/quash the rustication notice vide Rc. No. 166/2019/A4(i) dated 14.07.2023 and direct the respondent No.3 to allow the petitioner to appear in the Ph.D (Forestry) course.
3. The case of the Petitioner as per the averments made by the petitioner in the affidavit filed by the petitioner in su
ANKITA KAILASH KHANDELWAL AND OTHERS v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
“R.SESHAGIRI RAO AND OTHERS v. UNIVERSITY OF HYDERABAD AND ANOTHER
SUMIT MEHTA v. STATE OF N.C.T OF DELHI
Umanath Pandey & Others vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Another
A student cannot be rusticated from a college without being given an opportunity to be heard. Such a rustication order is arbitrary and unjust and violates the principles of natural justice.
A student cannot be rusticated without providing an opportunity of being heard and without following the principles of natural justice.
Administrative actions lacking proper procedure and notice violate principles of natural justice, rendering them arbitrary and illegal.
The court held that the decision of the respondent authorities to disqualify the petitioner under Regulation 5(a) without finding mala-fide possession of material was non-speaking and cryptic, and fa....
The failure to provide a hearing before terminating services violates principles of natural justice, rendering the decision invalid.
The principles of natural justice require that a quasi-judicial body cannot pass an adverse order against a party without giving them a notice and an opportunity to be heard.
The court emphasized that punitive actions against students must adhere to principles of natural justice, including the right to a fair hearing before any disciplinary action is taken.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.