IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
SUREPALLI NANDA, J.
V.V.R.N. Sastry & Another - Petitioners
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh & Others - Respondents
Writ Petition No.6900 Of 2014
Decided On : 30-10-2023
Writ Petition - Property Dispute - Sec.22-A (i) (a) of the Registration Act, 1908 - Summary of Acts and Sections: The court discussed the implications of Sec.22-A (i) (a) of the Registration Act, 1908 and its application in determining the ownership of the disputed property. The court also referred to the Andhra Pradesh Survey and Boundaries Act, 1923 and its provisions regarding the finality of entries in Town Survey Land Records. The judgment highlighted the relevance of TSLR entries and their consideration in conjunction with other documents in determining property ownership.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners sought relief against the notification of their private properties as 'G.Abadi' category of Government Land under Sec.22-A (i) (a) of the Registration Act, 1908. They claimed ownership based on purchase deeds, permissions, and tax payments. The respondents asserted Government ownership based on TSLR entries and Gazette notifications.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioners provided evidence of ownership and usage of the property, including sale deeds, permissions, and tax records. It noted that the TSLR entries were not conclusive proof of ownership and that the impugned decision lacked proper reasoning and violated principles of natural justice.
Issues: The main issues were the ownership of the disputed property and the validity of the notification under Sec.22-A (i) (a) of the Registration Act, 1908. The court also considered the procedural fairness and reasoning in the impugned decision.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that TSLR entries were not conclusive proof of ownership and that the impugned decision lacked proper reasoning and violated principles of natural justice. It emphasized the need for a reasonable opportunity of hearing and consideration of all relevant evidence in such cases.
Final Decision: The Writ Petition was allowed, and the impugned decision was set aside. The 2nd respondent was directed to reconsider the request for deletion of the properties from the Prohibited Properties Register, providing due notice and a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioners.
ORDER :
Heard Mr. B. Venkat Rama Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Government Pleader for Revenue, appearing for respondents.
2. The petitioners have approached the Court, seeking the following relief :
PERUSED THE RECORD :
3. The Counter affidavit filed by the 2nd respondent, in particular, paras 4, 5 and 9 read as under:
5. It is submitted that during the year 1964-69 Town Survey was conducted in Hyderabad District under the provisions of A.P. Survey and Boundaries Act, 1923 duly issuing notification under section 6(1) of the said Act inviting all the concerned to participate in the survey. After completion of the town survey the same was notified in the Gazette as required U/s 13 of Andhra Pradesh Survey & Boundaries Act, 1923 vide Gazette notification No. 36 dt.12.07.1967. The entries in Town Survey Land Records cannot be altered or modified by any means exceptly the Civil Court decree that would be filed within (3) years from the date of notification as per section 14 of the Act. Thus the entries in TSLR became final as no suit was filed questioning the said entries and binding on all. It is submitted that the Government vide G.O.Ms.No.1039, dt: 13-9-1972 have issued instructions stating that the classification of "Abadi lands have to be retained as "Abadi" and in cases where there are builtup area, the name to the occupant have to be re
State Of Andhra Pradesh v. P.V. Hanumantha Rao
State Of Andhra Pradesh v. Hyderabad Potteries Pvt. Ltd. And Another
AI
Disputed questions of fact regarding the classification of land as private or government property under Section 22-A of the Registration Act should be adjudicated by the designated administrative gri....
Entries in Town Survey Land Register do not confer ownership rights; representation of land use as municipal park found unsustainable based on prior judicial findings.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.