SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Telangana) 497

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
SUREPALLI NANDA, J.
V.V.R.N. Sastry & Another - Petitioners
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh & Others - Respondents
Writ Petition No.6900 Of 2014
Decided On : 30-10-2023

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. B. Venkat Rama Rao.

Headnote:

Writ Petition - Property Dispute - Sec.22-A (i) (a) of the Registration Act, 1908 - Summary of Acts and Sections: The court discussed the implications of Sec.22-A (i) (a) of the Registration Act, 1908 and its application in determining the ownership of the disputed property. The court also referred to the Andhra Pradesh Survey and Boundaries Act, 1923 and its provisions regarding the finality of entries in Town Survey Land Records. The judgment highlighted the relevance of TSLR entries and their consideration in conjunction with other documents in determining property ownership.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners sought relief against the notification of their private properties as 'G.Abadi' category of Government Land under Sec.22-A (i) (a) of the Registration Act, 1908. They claimed ownership based on purchase deeds, permissions, and tax payments. The respondents asserted Government ownership based on TSLR entries and Gazette notifications.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioners provided evidence of ownership and usage of the property, including sale deeds, permissions, and tax records. It noted that the TSLR entries were not conclusive proof of ownership and that the impugned decision lacked proper reasoning and violated principles of natural justice.

Issues: The main issues were the ownership of the disputed property and the validity of the notification under Sec.22-A (i) (a) of the Registration Act, 1908. The court also considered the procedural fairness and reasoning in the impugned decision.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that TSLR entries were not conclusive proof of ownership and that the impugned decision lacked proper reasoning and violated principles of natural justice. It emphasized the need for a reasonable opportunity of hearing and consideration of all relevant evidence in such cases.

Final Decision: The Writ Petition was allowed, and the impugned decision was set aside. The 2nd respondent was directed to reconsider the request for deletion of the properties from the Prohibited Properties Register, providing due notice and a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioners.

ORDER :

Heard Mr. B. Venkat Rama Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Government Pleader for Revenue, appearing for respondents.

2. The petitioners have approached the Court, seeking the following relief :

    “To issue a Writ, or order, or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the 1st Respondent in notifying the Petitioners private properties i.e., i) southern portion of plot No.3 admeasuring 357.3 Sq. Yds. owned and possessed by the 1st Petitioner and ii) northern portion of plot No.3 admeasuring 240 Sq.Yds owned and possessed by the 2nd Petitioner totally admeasuring 597.3 Sq. Yds in Plot No.3 bearing H.Nos.6-1-283/1/1 and 6-1-282/1/1 respectively of Padmarao Nagar, Musheerabad Mandal, Hyderabad as “G.Abadi” category of Government Land under Sec.22-A (i) (a) of the Registration Act, 1908 in the Prohibited Properties Register of Hyderabad District pursuant to Government of Andhra Pradesh Circular Memo No.G1/19131/05 Dt.14.09.2007 and issuing a letter Dt. 24.03.2013 through Lr.No.E5/3259/2012 by the Office the 2nd Respondent to the Petitioners intimating such notification of Petitioners Properties in the Prohibitory list as arbitrary, illegal, colourable exercise of power, and in violation of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 1st to 3rd Respondents to denotify the lands admeasuring 597.3 Sq.Yds bearing H.No. 6-1-283/1/1 and 6-1-282/1/1, of Padmarao Nagar, Musheerabad Mandal, Hyderabad District from the list of Prohibited Properties Register of Hyderabad district notified under Sec.22-A of the Act and direct all the Respondents to de-notify and delete the Petitioners private properties i.e., i) southern portion of plot No.3 admeasuring 357.3 Sq. Yds owned and possessed by the 1st Petitioner and ii) northern portion of plot No.3 admeasuring 240 Sq.Yds owned and possessed by the 2nd Petitioner totally admeasuring 597.3 Sq.Yds in Plot No.3 bearing H.Nos.6-1-283/1/1 and 6-1-282/1/1 respectively of Padmarao Nagar, Musheerabad Mandal, Hyderabad from the list of notified Prohibited Properties under Sec.22-A of the said Act or such other records of T.S.L.R. and Basic Market Value Register maintained by the Respondents, in the interest of justice.”

PERUSED THE RECORD :

3. The Counter affidavit filed by the 2nd respondent, in particular, paras 4, 5 and 9 read as under:

    “4. In reply to Para 2, it is submitted that the subject land bearing alleged H.No.6-1-283/1/1 and 6-1-282/1/1 has been identified on ground, falls in T.S.No.20, Block-F, Ward 148 of Zamistanpur Village, Musheerabad Mandal, Hyderabad District. As per Town Survey Land Register (TSLR) TS No. 20 to an extent of 479 Sq.Mtrs recorded as "Abadi" in Column No.10 and Col.No.20 is recorded as "GAbadi" and in Col.No.22 it is recorded as "Vacant Land". Thus said land belongs to Government and the State is the absolute owner and title holder of the said land.

5. It is submitted that during the year 1964-69 Town Survey was conducted in Hyderabad District under the provisions of A.P. Survey and Boundaries Act, 1923 duly issuing notification under section 6(1) of the said Act inviting all the concerned to participate in the survey. After completion of the town survey the same was notified in the Gazette as required U/s 13 of Andhra Pradesh Survey & Boundaries Act, 1923 vide Gazette notification No. 36 dt.12.07.1967. The entries in Town Survey Land Records cannot be altered or modified by any means exceptly the Civil Court decree that would be filed within (3) years from the date of notification as per section 14 of the Act. Thus the entries in TSLR became final as no suit was filed questioning the said entries and binding on all. It is submitted that the Government vide G.O.Ms.No.1039, dt: 13-9-1972 have issued instructions stating that the classification of "Abadi lands have to be retained as "Abadi" and in cases where there are builtup area, the name to the occupant have to be re

              Click Here to Read the rest of this document
              1
              2
              3
              4
              5
              6
              7
              8
              9
              10
              11
              Judicial Analysis

              AI

              SupremeToday Portrait Ad
              supreme today icon
              logo-black

              An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

              Please visit our Training & Support
              Center or Contact Us for assistance

              qr

              Scan Me!

              India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

              For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

              whatsapp-icon Back to top