IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
SUREPALLI NANDA, J.
V.Ravi Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana and others - Respondents
Writ Petition No.32266 of 2016
Decided on : 18-07-2023
Promotion - Seniority Dispute - Andhra Pradesh Forest Subordinate Service Rules - Rule 5, Rule 6(h)(i), Rule 8 - Telangana State Subordinate Service Rules, 1996 - Rule 6(b), Rule 5 - [FOREST OFFICER PROMOTION] - [Andhra Pradesh Forest Subordinate Service Rules 5, 6(h)(i), 8; Telangana State Subordinate Service Rules, 1996 - 6(b), 5] - The court discussed the provisions of Andhra Pradesh Forest Subordinate Service Rules, 2000 and Telangana State Subordinate Service Rules, 1996, particularly focusing on the eligibility criteria for promotion, method of appointment, and preparation of promotion panels. The court emphasized the importance of considering the training status and eligibility of candidates for promotion, as well as the authority's discretion in promoting fully qualified candidates during the panel year. The decision was influenced by the interpretation of these rules and the factual circumstances of the case.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a Forest Section Officer, challenged the promotion of junior officers to the position of Deputy Range Officers, alleging violation of seniority rules. The respondents argued that the petitioner was ineligible for promotion due to ongoing training.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner was undergoing training during the panel year and, therefore, was not eligible for promotion as per the relevant rules. The court upheld the promotion of junior officers based on their eligibility and dismissed the writ petition.
Issues: The main issue revolved around the promotion of junior officers over the petitioner, based on the interpretation of seniority rules and eligibility criteria for promotion.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the promotion of junior officers was in accordance with the rules, considering the petitioner's training status and the eligibility of other candidates during the panel year.
Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed, and the court found no illegality in the promotion orders. No costs were awarded, and pending miscellaneous petitions were closed.
ORDER:
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the unofficial respondent Nos.5 & 6 and learned Government Pleader on behalf of respondents No.1 to 4. 2. The petitioner has approached this Court, seeking the following relief:
3. The case of the Petitioner, in brief, as per writ affidavit filed, is as follows:
b. Respondent had issued the seniority list vide “GENERAL ESTABLISHMENT – CUM – INTER-SE-SENIORITY LIST OF FORESTERS (FOREST SECTION OFFICERS) OF NIZAMABAD CIRCLE” dated 01.01.2015 and the petitioner was placed at Serial No.4.
c. 3rd Respondent vide Rc.No.145/2016/M2(i) dated 31.08.2016 promoted 3 (Three) Foresters who were placed at Serial no. 2, 11 and 14 as Deputy Range Officersand posting orders were issued vide Rc.No.145/2016/M2(ii) dated 31.08.2016.While the Forester at Serial no. 2 is a senior of the Petitioner, the Foresters at Serial no.11 and 14 have been promoted as Foresters as 10.09.2009 and 29.04.2010.
d. According to Rule 5 of The Andhra Pradesh Forest Subordinate Service Rules, 2000 the method of appointment to the category of Deputy Range Officer from Forester is by way of promotion only and the appointing authority is Conservator of Forests of the concerned territorial circle and required qualifications are mentioned in detail in Section 5.
e. According to Rule 5 of Andhra Pradesh Forest Subordinate Services Training Rules, 2012, the trainees from the cadre of Forest Selection Officer shall be selected based on the Circle seniority list and;
f. According to Rule 7 of The Andhra Pradesh Forest Subordinate Service Rules, 2000 minimum service (for promotion/appointment by transfer), no person shall be eligible for promotion unless he has put in not less than 3 years of service in the category from which promotion and transfer is made.
g. Rule 8 of A.P. State and Subordinate Service Rules states, for appointment to a higher post either by promotion from one category to another within a service or by appointment by transfer from one service to any other service, a member of a service or class of a service, shall have satisfactorily completed his probation in the category from which he is proposed to be promoted or appointed by transfer of such higher position and the Deputy Range Officer post is a non-selection post.
h. According to Rule 6(h)(i) of A.P. State and Subordinate Service Rules. 1996, For non-selection posts referred to in sub rule (b) of Rule 5, the appointing authority shall prepare a list of eligible employees every year from 1st September of the year to 31st August of succeeding year after considering the record sheet and qualification prescribed for the said post in relevant Special Rules for promotion to next higher category of non-selection post.
i. Rule 5(b) – Non selection posts – Non Gazetted should be tre
The central legal point established in the judgment is the importance of considering the eligibility and training status of candidates for promotion, as well as the authority's discretion in promotin....
A candidate must successfully complete the full course of Training in Forestry to be eligible for promotion to the category of Deputy Range Officer under Rule 5 of the Telangana Forest Subordinate Se....
Retrospective promotion cannot be granted to an employee from a date when the employee was not borne in the cadre. Sub-rule (3) of Rule 8 of the 2002 Rules was found inapplicable to determine the int....
An individual cannot claim a promotion based on temporary assignments; promotions must adhere strictly to seniority and established rules.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.