SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Telangana) 599

SUREPALLI NANDA
V. Ravi Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr G. Raman Goud

ORDER:

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the unofficial respondent Nos.5 & 6 and learned Government Pleader on behalf of respondents No.1 to 4. 2. The petitioner has approached this Court, seeking the following relief:

    “To issue a Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in nature of a Writ of Mandamus (a) Declaring the action of third respondent in issuing the impugned order in Rc. No. 145/2016/M2(i) dated 31.08.2016 and consequential orders in Rc.No.145/2016/M2(ii)dated 31.08.2016 and communicated by the 4th Respondent vide Rc.No.293/S1/2016 ignoring and overlooking the petitioner who is senior according to the seniority list communicated by the respondents as on 01.01.2015 and promoting the unofficial respondent as on 01.01.2015 and promoting the unofficial respondent 5 and 6 as Deputy Range Officers who are junior to the petitioner as arbitrary, illegal, against rules and to set aside the same; and (b) Consequently, direct respondents to promote petitioner as Deputy Range Officer according to the seniority list as on 01.01.2015.

3

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
      whatsapp-icon Back to top