K. SURENDER
Shyamala Pramod Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
K. SURENDER, J.
1. The appellant is questioning his conviction vide judgment in C.C. No. 21 of 2005 dated 13.04.2010 passed by the Principal Special Judge for SPE & ACB Cases, and being sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months for the offence under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act (for short ‘the Act’) and also sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year for the offence under Section 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of the Act.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the appellant was working as Assistant Labour Officer, Godavarikhani, Karimnagar District. The case of PW-1/defacto complainant is that he and other medical agencies in the area did not have labour licences for engaging workers. Accordingly, on 19.06.2003, PW-1 met the appellant and enquired about the licences. Since there was no response, PW-1 again met him on 20.06.2003. When PW-1 enquired about the licences, appellant demanded an amount of Rs. 15,000/- as bribe for issuing licences. The applications were not received by the appellant from PW-1 and others. Again on 21.06.2003, PW-1 met the appellant and also met one person by name Sathish Kumar. On 24.06.2003
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.