SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Telangana) 19

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
SUREPALLI NANDA, J.
Avinash Reddy Paladugu – Appellant
Versus
The Bureau of Immigration (BOI) and others – Respondents
W.P. No. 515 of 2024
Decided on : 26-02-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr Katika Ravinder Reddy
For the Respondent: Mr. T.Sudhakar Reddy

IMPORTANT POINT
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the issuance of a Look Out Circular should be based on exceptional circumstances and cogent reasons, and should not be resorted to in a routine manner. The court emphasized the petitioner's right to personal liberty and free movement, and the adverse civil consequences of the Look Out Circular.

Headnote:

Look Out Circular - Writ Petition - Office Memorandum dated 22.02.2021 - A, B, C, D, H, I, J, and L - The court discussed the issuance of Look Out Circular (LOC) against the petitioner based on Crime No. 211 of 2023, dated 07.04.2023, and the relevant guidelines from the Office Memorandum dated 22.02.2021. The court highlighted the key legal provisions and their interpretations, emphasizing the exceptional circumstances required for issuing an LOC and the need for cogent reasons to support its issuance.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought a Writ of Mandamus to declare the issuance of Look Out Circular against them as illegal and contrary to law, and to direct the respondents to withdraw the Look Out Circular.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the Look Out Circular issued against the petitioner was contrary to the guidelines and was not supported by compelling and extraordinary circumstances. The court emphasized the petitioner's right to personal liberty and free movement, and the adverse civil consequences of the Look Out Circular.

Issues: The main issues included the legality of the Look Out Circular, the petitioner's cooperation with the trial, and the potential impact on the petitioner's job and personal life.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the Look Out Circular should be issued in exceptional circumstances and on cogent reasons, and should not be resorted to in a routine manner. The court emphasized the petitioner's right to personal liberty and free movement, and the need for compelling and extraordinary circumstances to support the issuance of an LOC.

Final Decision: The court allowed the writ petition and directed the respondents to withdraw the Look Out Circular issued against the petitioner based on Crime No.211 of 2023, dated 07.04.2023, on the file of Women Police Station, DD, Hyderabad.

Judgement Key Points

What is the legality of issuing a Look Out Circular (LOC) against a person in light of guidelines and constitutional rights?

What are the exceptional circumstances and cogent reasons required to justify a Look Out Circular, and must LOCs be reviewed/deleted regularly?

What are the rights of an individual (personal liberty, movement) when an LOC is issued, and can a court require withdrawal of an LOC when not supported by proper grounds?


ORDER :

Heard Mr. Katika Ravinder Reddy, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners, Mr Gadi Praveen, learned Deputy Solicitor General of India appearing on behalf of Respondent No.1, learned Government Pleader for Home appearing on behalf of respondent No.2 and Mr T. Sudhakar Reddy, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.3.

2. Petitioner approached the Court seeking prayer as under :

    This Writ Petition is filed to issue a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in issuing Look Out Circular against the petitioner based on Crime No. 211 of 2023, dated 07.04.2023, on the file of Women Police Station, DD, Hyderabad, as illegal and contrary to law and an abuse of authority and process of law, and consequently, direct the Respondents to withdraw the Look Out Circular issued against the petitioner based on Crime No. 211 of 2023, dated 07.04.2023, on the file of Women Police Station, DD, Hyderabad.

3. PERUSED THE RECORD :

A. Office Memorandum dated 22.02.2021 dealing with consolidated guidelines for issuance of Look Out Circular in respect of Indian Citizens and Foreigners and the relevant paras of the said A, B, C, D, H, I, J, and L, of the said circular are extracted hereunder:

    “6. The existing guidelines with regard to issuance of Look Out Circulars (LOC) in respect of Indian citizens and foreigners have been reviewed by this Ministry. After due deliberations in consultation with various stakeholders and in supersession of all the existing guidelines issued vide this Ministry’s letters/O.M. referred to in para 1 above, it has been decided with the approval of the competent authority that the following consolidated guidelines shall be followed henceforth by all concerned for the purpose of issuance of Look Out Circulars (LOC) in respect of Indian citizens and foreigners:-

A. The request for opening an LOC would be made by the Originating Agency (OA) to the Deputy Director, Bureau of Immigration (BoI), East Block – VIII, R.K. Puram, New Delhi – 110066 (Telefax: 011- 26192883, email:boihq@nic.in) in the enclosed proforma.

B. The request for opening of LOC must invariably be issued with the approval of an Originating Agency that shall be an officer not below the rank of – (i) Deputy Secretary to the Government of India; or (ii) Joint Secretary in the State Government; or (iii) District Magistrate of the District concerned; or (iv) Superintendent of Police (SP) of the District concerned; or (v) SP in CBI or an officer of equivalent level working in CBI; or (vi) Zonal Director in Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) or an officer of equivalent level (including Assistant Director (Ops) in Headquarters of NCB]; or (vii) Deputy Commissioner or an officer of equivalent level in the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence or Central Board of Direct Taxes or Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs; or (viii) Assistant Director of Intelligence Bureau/Bureau of Immigration (BoI); or (ix) Deputy Secretary of Research and Analysis Wing (R&A W); or (x) An officer not below the level of Superintendent of Police in National Investigation Agency; or (xi) Assistant Director of Enforcement Directorate; or (xii) Protector of Emigrants in the office of the Protectorate of Emigrants or an officer not below the rank of Deputy Secretary to the Government of India; or (xiii) Designated officer of Interpol; or (xiv) An officer of Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO), Ministry of Corporate Affairs not below the rank of Additional Director (in the rank of Director in the Government of India); or (xv) Chairman/Managing Directors/Chief Executive of all Public Sector Banks.”

C. LOCs can also be issued as per directions of any Criminal Court in India. In all such cases, request for opening of LOC shall be initiated by the local police or by any other Law Enforcement Agencies concerned so that all parameters for opening LOCs are available.

D. The name and designation of the officer signing the Proforma for requesting issuance of an L

              Click Here to Read the rest of this document
              1
              2
              3
              4
              5
              6
              7
              8
              9
              10
              11
              SupremeToday Portrait Ad
              supreme today icon
              logo-black

              An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

              Please visit our Training & Support
              Center or Contact Us for assistance

              qr

              Scan Me!

              India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

              For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

              whatsapp-icon Back to top