Back
SUREPALLI NANDA
Avinash Reddy Paladugu – Appellant
Versus
Bureau of Immigration (BOI) – Respondent
ORDER :
Heard Mr. Katika Ravinder Reddy, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners, Mr Gadi Praveen, learned Deputy Solicitor General of India appearing on behalf of Respondent No.1, learned Government Pleader for Home appearing on behalf of respondent No.2 and Mr T. Sudhakar Reddy, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.3.
2. Petitioner approached the Court seeking prayer as under :
3. PERUSED THE RECORD :
A. Office Memorandum dated 22.02.2021 dealing with consolidated guidelines for issuance of Look Out Circular in respect of Indian Citizens and Foreigners and the relevant paras of the said A, B, C, D, H, I, J, and L, of the said cir
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the issuance and renewal of Look Out Circulars (LOC) must align with the legal provisions and principles outlined in the relevant Office Me....
The issuance of a Look-Out Circular must be justified; arbitrary LOCs infringe personal liberty under Article 21.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
