IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
SUREPALLI NANDA, J.
Avinash Reddy Paladugu – Appellant
Versus
The Bureau of Immigration (BOI) and others – Respondents
W.P. No. 515 of 2024
Decided on : 26-02-2024
Look Out Circular - Writ Petition - Office Memorandum dated 22.02.2021 - A, B, C, D, H, I, J, and L - The court discussed the issuance of Look Out Circular (LOC) against the petitioner based on Crime No. 211 of 2023, dated 07.04.2023, and the relevant guidelines from the Office Memorandum dated 22.02.2021. The court highlighted the key legal provisions and their interpretations, emphasizing the exceptional circumstances required for issuing an LOC and the need for cogent reasons to support its issuance.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought a Writ of Mandamus to declare the issuance of Look Out Circular against them as illegal and contrary to law, and to direct the respondents to withdraw the Look Out Circular.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the Look Out Circular issued against the petitioner was contrary to the guidelines and was not supported by compelling and extraordinary circumstances. The court emphasized the petitioner's right to personal liberty and free movement, and the adverse civil consequences of the Look Out Circular.
Issues: The main issues included the legality of the Look Out Circular, the petitioner's cooperation with the trial, and the potential impact on the petitioner's job and personal life.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the Look Out Circular should be issued in exceptional circumstances and on cogent reasons, and should not be resorted to in a routine manner. The court emphasized the petitioner's right to personal liberty and free movement, and the need for compelling and extraordinary circumstances to support the issuance of an LOC.
Final Decision: The court allowed the writ petition and directed the respondents to withdraw the Look Out Circular issued against the petitioner based on Crime No.211 of 2023, dated 07.04.2023, on the file of Women Police Station, DD, Hyderabad.
ORDER :
Heard Mr. Katika Ravinder Reddy, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners, Mr Gadi Praveen, learned Deputy Solicitor General of India appearing on behalf of Respondent No.1, learned Government Pleader for Home appearing on behalf of respondent No.2 and Mr T. Sudhakar Reddy, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.3.
2. Petitioner approached the Court seeking prayer as under :
3. PERUSED THE RECORD :
A. Office Memorandum dated 22.02.2021 dealing with consolidated guidelines for issuance of Look Out Circular in respect of Indian Citizens and Foreigners and the relevant paras of the said A, B, C, D, H, I, J, and L, of the said circular are extracted hereunder:
A. The request for opening an LOC would be made by the Originating Agency (OA) to the Deputy Director, Bureau of Immigration (BoI), East Block – VIII, R.K. Puram, New Delhi – 110066 (Telefax: 011- 26192883, email:boihq@nic.in) in the enclosed proforma.
B. The request for opening of LOC must invariably be issued with the approval of an Originating Agency that shall be an officer not below the rank of – (i) Deputy Secretary to the Government of India; or (ii) Joint Secretary in the State Government; or (iii) District Magistrate of the District concerned; or (iv) Superintendent of Police (SP) of the District concerned; or (v) SP in CBI or an officer of equivalent level working in CBI; or (vi) Zonal Director in Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) or an officer of equivalent level (including Assistant Director (Ops) in Headquarters of NCB]; or (vii) Deputy Commissioner or an officer of equivalent level in the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence or Central Board of Direct Taxes or Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs; or (viii) Assistant Director of Intelligence Bureau/Bureau of Immigration (BoI); or (ix) Deputy Secretary of Research and Analysis Wing (R&A W); or (x) An officer not below the level of Superintendent of Police in National Investigation Agency; or (xi) Assistant Director of Enforcement Directorate; or (xii) Protector of Emigrants in the office of the Protectorate of Emigrants or an officer not below the rank of Deputy Secretary to the Government of India; or (xiii) Designated officer of Interpol; or (xiv) An officer of Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO), Ministry of Corporate Affairs not below the rank of Additional Director (in the rank of Director in the Government of India); or (xv) Chairman/Managing Directors/Chief Executive of all Public Sector Banks.”
C. LOCs can also be issued as per directions of any Criminal Court in India. In all such cases, request for opening of LOC shall be initiated by the local police or by any other Law Enforcement Agencies concerned so that all parameters for opening LOCs are available.
D. The name and designation of the officer signing the Proforma for requesting issuance of an L
MENAKA GANDHI VS. UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER” reported in AIR 1978 SC 597
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the issuance and renewal of Look Out Circulars (LOC) must align with the legal provisions and principles outlined in the relevant Office Me....
The issuance of a Look-Out Circular must be justified; arbitrary LOCs infringe personal liberty under Article 21.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.