Back
SUREPALLI NANDA
Vamshikrishna Indarapu – Appellant
Versus
Govt. of India – Respondent
ORDER:
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also heard learned Counsel appearing on behalf of respondents.
2. The petitioner approached the Court seeking prayer as under:
The principle of mandamus to compel the performance of a public duty was applied to direct the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation.
Arbitrariness, illegality, and irrationality in the decision-making process of a government entity, and the application of Article 15(3) of the Constitution for special provisions for women.
The court upheld the rejection of the representation based on the well-reasoned and speaking order provided by the respondents, considering various factors such as RBI Guidelines, Selection Guideline....
LPG distributorship - Declaration that the applicant had never been convicted for any charge; no charge had been framed by any Court of law for any criminal offences involving moral turpitude or an e....
Point of Law : Applications for selection of regular LPG distributorships were invited in April, 2011 by BPCL. One of the eligibility criteria was that the applicant should own a plot of land of adeq....
Respondents cannot impose unadvertised conditions post-application, as the applicant's land met the described criteria, thereby affirming the legitimate expectation of the applicant.
The court confirmed that a specific location's advertisement does not necessitate the land being in a specified village, protecting the applicant's legitimate expectation for dealership consideration....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
