SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Telangana) 77

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
N.V. SHRAVAN KUMAR, J.
G. Narsaiah - Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary - Respondent
Writ Petition (TR) No. 5598 of 2017
Decided On : 05-02-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : K. Rama Subba Rao.

IMPORTANT POINT
The main legal point established in the judgment is that fair opportunity to defend oneself must be provided, but admission of serious misconduct supported by evidence can justify disciplinary action.

Headnote:

Natural Justice - Home Guard - A.P. Home Guards Act, 1948 - Section 11, Section 7 - The court found that the petitioner was given fair opportunity to prove innocence, but admitted attending duty in drunken state. The committee held that the explanation given by the petitioner was not convincing and recommended removal. The court upheld the impugned order for removal, stating that the charges against the petitioner constituted serious misconduct and were supported by medical evidence.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a Home Guard, was alleged to have attended duty in a drunken state. Despite being given opportunities to defend himself, the petitioner admitted to attending duty in a drunken state.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioner was given fair opportunity to prove innocence, but admitted attending duty in drunken state. The committee held that the explanation given by the petitioner was not convincing and recommended removal.

Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner was given a fair opportunity to defend himself before the impugned order for removal was passed.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the petitioner was given ample opportunity to defend himself, but his admission of attending duty in a drunken state, supported by medical evidence, constituted serious misconduct justifying the impugned order for removal.

Final Decision: The court dismissed the writ petition, confirming the impugned order for removal of the petitioner from the Home Guard Organization.

ORDER :

This writ petition(TR) has been filed seeking to “call for records relating to order bearing No DO.No.03/2015, C.No 19/RI-HGs/ADD/2015, dated 09.01.2015 of the 3rd Respondent and set-aside the same as illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice and Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct reinstatement of applicant as Home Guard with all consequential benefits as though the impugned order was never made and pass such other order or orders”

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner/applicant (hereafter called ‘petitioner’) was appointed as Home Guard in Home Guards Organization on 02-09-2002. After completion of training, petitioner was posted to Hajipur Police Station, Mancherial. On 02.03.2013, petitioner was posted to FCI Food Storage Depot, Mancherial. However, on 07.03.2013, the Manager of FCI has addressed a letter to Divisional Supertindent of Police, Manchierial stating that the petitioner is coming to office in drunken condition and he is not obliging to FCI official and also request to replace the petitioner with other Home guard to safeguard the FCI National Properties. Thereafter, on 07.03.2013, the Inspector of Police, Mancherial Police Station, Adilabad District has addressed a letter to Duty Medical Officer, Government Area Hospital, Macherial to examine the petitioner and issue necessary certification to specially state whether the petitioner is in intoxication state or not and on the same day, i.e., 07.03.2013, the Duty Medical Officer examined the petitioner and stated that the petitioner is “under the influence of alcohol of mild degree”. Thereafter, Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Manchiryal addressed a letter along with Report of Manager, FCI and medical opinion of the Medical Officer to Superintendent of Police, dated 14.03.2013, vide C.No.247/SDM/2013, dated 14.03.2013 stating that the petitioner is not doing his duty properly and he is habituated to consume liquor and request to take action against him, subsequently, the petitioner was suspended, vide C.No.37/RI/HG/add/2013, dated 11.05.2013. Thereafter, on 06.06.2013, a show-cause notice was issued to the petitioner on 06.06.2013, vide C.No.37/RI/HG/ADD/2013, to submit explanation within 10 (days). Thereafter, petitioner submitted explanation on 17.06.2013 before Superintendent of Police requesting to revoke the suspension order on humanitarian ground. Thereafter, enquiry was conducted by Inspector of Police, Manchiryal, vide C.No.93/L1/2014, dated 25.04.2014 and held that the petitioner used to consume alcohol and attend for duties. On 07.03.2013 at 14-00 Hrs to 18-00 the petitioner has to attend duty but the petitioner arrived in advance to Godown by 11.00 hrs in drunken state and after having lunch he slept in the veranda to attend his duty from 14.00 hrs to 18.00 hr. However, the manager observed that the petitioner was in sleeping in drunken state and immediately the petitioner was sent to Medical Examination and the Medical officer has also confirmed the same that the petitioner is under the influence of alcohol of mild degree, hence the petitioner has attended his duty in drunken state and submitted a report that the charges are proved. Thereafter, Superintendent of Police, Adilabad has issued another show cause notice, vide C.No.37/RI/HG/ADD/2014, dated 26.12.2014 and submit the explanation within (10) days. On 07.01.2015, the petitioner submits his explanation stating that on 07.03.2013, and the petitioner has attended function of his friend and thereafter went to attend duty and admitted that due to force from petitioner’s family member, he has consumed little bit of alcohol and immediately rushed to work place. Subsequently, Committee members of Home Guards Organization comprising of i) Member-Dy.Superintendent of Police, Adilabad District, ii) Convener-Commandant (T), Home Guards, Hyderabad and iii) Chairman, Superintendent of Police, Adilabad District has held committ

                    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                    1
                    2
                    3
                    4
                    5
                    6
                    7
                    8
                    9
                    10
                    11
                    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                    supreme today icon
                    logo-black

                    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                    Please visit our Training & Support
                    Center or Contact Us for assistance

                    qr

                    Scan Me!

                    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                    whatsapp-icon Back to top