SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Telangana) 88

SUREPALLI NANDA
Bera Satyanarayana – Appellant
Versus
Gajula Vijayalaxmi – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. V.Rohith
For the Respondent: Mr. K.Ajay Kumar

ORDER :

Heard Mr.V.Rohith, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr.K.Ajay Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents.

2. This Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging the Propriety and Legality of the Order dated 14.08.2023, in I.A.No.575 of 2022 in O.S.No.55 of 2013 on the file of Additional Senior Civil Judge at Mancherial, whereunder the petition under Section 151 C.P.C. filed by the defendants to reopen their evidence that was closed on 05.07.2022, was dismissed.

3. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as they are arrayed in the suit before the trial court.

The defendants filed I.A.No.575 of 2022 under section 151 C.P.C. to reopen their evidence which was closed on 05.07.2022. The plea of the defendants is that the suit was posted for their evidence and the original documents were filed in E.P.No.44 of 2015 filed by the plaintiff. The E.P., was closed on 31.10.2016. The defendants filed petition for return of the original documents filed in E.P.44/2015 and they are yet to receive the return of the documents. On 05-07-2022, the trial court closed the evidence of defendants as they were not ready to adduce evidence for want

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top