A. SANTHOSH REDDY
B. Kista Reddy – Appellant
Versus
V. Srilatha – Respondent
JUDGMENT
A.SANTHOSH REDDY, J. - This second appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dtd. 16/9/2011 in A.S.No.288 of 2006, on the file of the III-Additional District Judge (FTC), Ranga Reddy District, wherein the said appeal filed by respondent No.1 herein (plaintiff) was allowed by setting the judgment and decree dtd. 21/11/2006 in O.S.No.11 of 1997, on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District, whereinunder the suit filed by respondent No.1 was dismissed.
2. Heard Sri E.Madan Mohan Rao, learned senior counsel, appearing for Sri Gaddam Srinivas, learned counsel for the appellants, and Sri A.Ravinder Reddy, learned senior counsel, appearing for Sri M.Amogh Reddy, learned counsel for the respondent. Perused the record.
3. For the sake of convenience, the parties are hereinafter referred to as arrayed in the suit.
4. The plaintiff filed suit for specific performance of agreement of sale dtd. 24/1/1994. According to the plaintiff, defendant Nos.1 to 5 are the owners of suit schedule land in Sy.Nos.404, admeasuring Acs.12-36 Gts., and land in Sy.No.405 admeasuring Acs.2-00 at Poodur Village. Defendant Nos. 1 to 3 agreed to sell suit the schedule proper
Pushparani S.Sundaram and Ors. V. Pauline Manomani James (Deceased) and Ors.
N.P.Thirugnanam (Dead) By L.Rs. V. Dr.R. Jagan Mohan Rao and Ors.
Padmakumari and Ors. V. Dasayyan and Ors.
C.S. Venkatesh V. A.S.C.Murthy (D) By L.Rs. and Ors.
Katta Sujatha Reddy and Ors. V. Siddamsetty Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd and Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.