SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Telangana) 654

A. SANTHOSH REDDY
B. Kista Reddy – Appellant
Versus
V. Srilatha – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
E.Madan Mohan Rao, Advocate, Gaddam Srinivas, Advocate, A.Ravinder Reddy, Advocate, Amogh Reddy, Advocate

JUDGMENT

A.SANTHOSH REDDY, J. - This second appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dtd. 16/9/2011 in A.S.No.288 of 2006, on the file of the III-Additional District Judge (FTC), Ranga Reddy District, wherein the said appeal filed by respondent No.1 herein (plaintiff) was allowed by setting the judgment and decree dtd. 21/11/2006 in O.S.No.11 of 1997, on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District, whereinunder the suit filed by respondent No.1 was dismissed.

2. Heard Sri E.Madan Mohan Rao, learned senior counsel, appearing for Sri Gaddam Srinivas, learned counsel for the appellants, and Sri A.Ravinder Reddy, learned senior counsel, appearing for Sri M.Amogh Reddy, learned counsel for the respondent. Perused the record.

3. For the sake of convenience, the parties are hereinafter referred to as arrayed in the suit.

4. The plaintiff filed suit for specific performance of agreement of sale dtd. 24/1/1994. According to the plaintiff, defendant Nos.1 to 5 are the owners of suit schedule land in Sy.Nos.404, admeasuring Acs.12-36 Gts., and land in Sy.No.405 admeasuring Acs.2-00 at Poodur Village. Defendant Nos. 1 to 3 agreed to sell suit the schedule proper

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top