SAMBASIVARAO NAIDU
Sharda Tiwari – Appellant
Versus
Pandit Ashok Kumar Tiwari – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. The appellants/respondents/defendants 1 and 2 have filed these two Civil Miscellaneous Appeals under Order 43 Rule 1 C.P.C., assailing the Orders, dtd. 10/3/2022 in two interlocutory applications vide I.A.No.1204 of 2018 and 1205 of 2018 in O.S.No.333 of 2018 on the file of XVI Additional District and Sessions Judge, Rangareddy. The respondent/petitioner/plaintiff filed the above stated interlocutory applications before the learned XVI Additional District Judge (hereinafter be referred as trial Court) under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 r/w Sec. 151 C.P.C. for two separate relief namely temporary injunction to restrain the appellants herein (shown as respondents 1 and 2 in the interlocutory applications) from changing the physical features of the suit schedule property and also to restrain them from alienating/transferring suit "A" schedule property in favour of 3rd parties pending disposal of the main suit. The trial Court having considered the affidavit filed in support of the petition, and counter affidavit of the respondents i.e., appellants herein, allowed the interlocutory applications and granted temporary injunction against the appellants herein. Being aggrieved by the s
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.