SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Telangana) 667

J. SREENIVAS RAO
Mamillapalli Seetaramayya – Appellant
Versus
Government of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
S.Madan Mohan Rao, Advocate

JUDGMENT

1. This writ petition is filed seeking writ of Mandamus declaring the order in G.O.M.S.No.9, Social Welfare(LTR.2) Department dt.31/1/2013 of respondent No.1 herein confirming the Order dtd. 20/6/2002 in C.M.A.No.24 of 2001 of respondent No.2 herein and also the order dtd. 11/4/1997 in LTR Case No.16/96/MKP of the respondent No.3 herein as illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable contrary to the provisions of A.P. Scheduled Area (Land Transfer) Regulations and also violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300 A of the Constitution of India and issue a consequential direction to the respondents herein not to give effect to the same.

2. Heard Sri S. Madan Mohan Rao learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Social Welfare appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 4. During the pendency of the writ petition respondent No.5 died and the respondent Nos.6 to 30 were brought on record as legal representatives in I.A.No.1 of 2018. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent No.3 has not granted any relief in favour of respondent No.5 and his legal heirs i.e., respondent Nos.6 to 30 who are only proforma parties.

3. Learned counsel for the petit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top