SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Telangana) 798

D. NAGARJUN
R. Sudarshan Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Gurrala Vijitha – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. This petition is filed by the accused in C.C.No.6211 of 2021 challenging the orders dtd. 22/10/2019 passed by the III Metropolitan Magistrate-cum-III Additional Junior Civil Judge, Cyberabad at L.B. Nagar in Crl.M.P.No.1831 of 2019 in C.C.No.6211 of 2021, which was filed for sending the cheque in dispute to the hand writing expert.

2. The brief facts, as can be gathered from the record presented before the Court, are that respondent No.1/complainant has filed C.C.No.6211 of 2021 against the petitioner/accused under Sec. 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 (for short, "the Act"). The contents of the said complaint would go to show that on 4/1/2017, the petitioner has approached respondent No.1 to invest an amount of Rs.50.00 lakhs in the film production of a movie titled as Prema Katha Chitram-2 for which respondent No.1 promised to pay the said amount within four months and accordingly, paid an amount of Rs.8.00 lakhs on 4/1/2017 and also issued cheques for some more amounts in the month of January and February, 2017, in the presence of one A. Prabhakar Reddy, who is no other than the father of respondent No.1. In all respondent No.1 has paid an amount of Rs.28.00

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top