SUREPALLI NANDA
Gudi Satyanarayana Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Maggidi Narsaiah (died) per L. Rs. – Respondent
ORDER:
Heard Sri Lingam Divakara Rao, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Sri M. Mallesham, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents.
2. The Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging propriety and legality of the order dated “11.06.2024 in I.A.No.39 of 2023, in A.S.No.11 of 2017 on the file of the Additional District Judge at Godavarikhani”, whereunder a petition filed under Order 41 Rule 27 read with Section 157 CPC filed by the Appellants/plaintiffs was allowed.
3. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as they are arrayed in the appeal before the lower Court.
4. The appellants/plaintiffs filed I.A.No.139 of 2023 in A.S.No.11 of 2017 on the file of Additional District Judge at Godavarikhani, under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC, praying the Court that the documents namely certified copy of Registered Sale Deed, Rythu Passbook and Simple Sale Deeds etc., may be considered in the interest of justice.
5. The appellants/plaintiffs plea is that they filed petition before the trial Court to receive those documents and the Court dismissed the petition and they filed revision petition before the Hon’ble Court and the Revision Petition was returne
Arjan Singh v. Kartar Singh & Ors.
Indirajit Pratab Sahi v. Amar Singh
Natha Singh & Ors. v. The Financial Commissioner, Taxation, Punjab & Ors.
Parsotim Thakur & Ors. v. Lal Mohar Thakur & Ors.
Sanjay Kumar Singh v. State of Jharkhand
Syed Abdul Khader v. Rami Reddy and others
Union of India v. Ibhrahim Uddin and another reported in 2012 (8) SCC 148
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.