B. Laxshmi Rajyam vs Chief Commissioner of Land Admn

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(Telangana) 242

SUREPALLI NANDA
B. Laxshmi Rajyam – Appellant
Versus
Chief Commissioner of Land Admn – Respondent

Advocates:
Case Referred :
Oryx Fisheries Pvt., Ltd., Vs. Union of India & Others, (2010) 13 SCC 427

Table of Content
1. court's procedural history. (Para 1)
2. writ petitions for alienation of land rights. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
3. documentary evidence supporting land claim. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
4. the government's role and previous actions in the case. (Para 10)
5. the court's orders and rationale regarding natural justice. (Para 11)
6. court's observation on procedural fairness. (Para 12 , 13 , 14)
7. court orders for land allotment consideration. (Para 15 , 16 , 17)

ORDER :

Heard Mr J.Sudheer, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for revenue and also learned Government Pleader for Social Welfare appearing on behalf of respondents.

2. The petitioner Smt B.Lakshmi Rajyam, W/o B.Prakas Rao, correspondent Beulah School, Chitkul, Patancheru (Mandal), Medak District has filed the three writ petitions vide W.P.Nos.4692 of 2004, 16678 of 2014 and 19119 of 2021 seeking respective prayer’s.

3. The prayer in W.P.No.4692 of 2004, is as under:

“to issue a writ, order or direction(s) essentially in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to alienate the land to the petitioner herein wherein the petitioner’s school and playground is situated to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2024 Supreme(Telangana) 242

SUREPALLI NANDAB. Laxshmi Rajyam – AppellantVersusChief Commissioner of Land Admn – Respondent

SUREPALLI NANDA
B. Laxshmi Rajyam – Appellant
Versus
Chief Commissioner of Land Admn – Respondent