Back
ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI, LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY
B. Maremma, Hyd. – Appellant
Versus
Spl. Court, A. P. Land Grabbing, Hyd – Respondent
ORDER :
(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Laxmi Narayana Alishetty)
This writ petition is filed assailing the order dated 12.12.2008 passed by the Special Court under A.P.Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, Hyderabad (for short, ‘Special Court’) in L.G.C.No.36 of 2007.
2. Heard Sri Jogram Tejavath, learned counsel for petitioner, and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent no.1.
3. Petitioner herein is the applicant and the respondent no.2 herein is the respondent before the Special Court. Respondent no.1 herein is the Special Court.
4. The brief facts as narrated in the application filed before the Special Court are that petitioner is claiming to be the owner of house bearing No.12-10-379/A, admeasuring 48 square yards situated at Erukala Basthi, Zamistanpur, Sithaphal Mandi, Hyderabad (hereinafter referred to ‘schedule property’). The petitioner is claiming ownership by virtue of patta certificate issued in the year 1996 by the Revenue Department in her name; that due to family problems and ill-health, petitioner shifted from Zamistanpur village to Ramnagar on the advice of elders; that taking advantage of absence of petitioner, respondent no.2 grabbed the schedule pro
The applicant in land grabbing cases must establish prima facie title; failure to do so results in dismissal of claims.
Possession without legal title constitutes land grabbing; the court affirmed the applicants' valid ownership based on registered sale deeds, invalidating the respondents' claims.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
