Back
K. LAKSHMAN
Nagulapati Ramulu – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Heard Mr. Rapolu Bhaskar, learned counsel for the petitioner in W.P. Nos. 30235 and 32928 of 2022 and respondent No. 6 in W.P. No. 30452 of 2022 and respondent No. 8 in W.P. No. 44081 of 2022, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing on behalf of official respondents in all the writ petitions and Mr. E. Sreenivasa Rao, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 5 to 7 in W.P. No. 32928 of 2022 and respondent Nos. 6 and 7 in W.P. No. 30235 of 2022 and petitioners in W.P. Nos. 30452 and 44081 of 2022.
2. Lis involved in all the aforesaid writ petitions and the parties are one and the same with regard to dispute in respect of the land admeasuring Acs. 2.25 guntas in Survey No. 902, situated at Eduluru Village of Kattangur Mandal, Nalgonda District.
3. The respective petitioners have filed the respective writ petitions seeking the following reliefs:
The court ruled that parties must await the resolution of pending suits regarding land ownership before seeking further legal relief, emphasizing the prohibition of actions that interfere with ongoin....
The survey and issuance of pattadar passbooks without adhering to principles of natural justice are invalid, necessitating proper notice and opportunity for all parties involved.
Point of law: When the quasi judicial authority entertained an Appeal, a writ of mandamus cannot be issued, since it is only to prohibition from proceeding with the appeal. Writ of Prohibition can be....
The court held that surveys affecting property rights must adhere to principles of natural justice, requiring notifications to all interested parties, particularly in urban properties under the ROR A....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
