IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K. LAKSHMAN, J.
Nagulapati Ramulu – Petitioner
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
Writ Petition Nos. 30235, 30452, 32928, 44081 of 2022
Decided On : 18-09-2024
(A) Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 – The court addressed the legality of the issuance of pattadar passbooks amidst ongoing civil suits regarding land ownership. The petitioner claimed ownership of land but failed to provide sufficient evidence of title or possession. The court emphasized that the petitioner must await the outcome of pending suits before seeking further relief. (Paras 4, 6, 20, 24)
(B) Legal proceedings – The court ruled that conducting surveys or issuing pattadar passbooks during the pendency of disputes is impermissible. The court set aside actions taken by the police and survey officials that interfered with ongoing litigation. (Paras 21, 22, 23)
Facts of the case: The petitioner claimed ownership of land in Eduluru Village, asserting rights based on a partition and subsequent possession. Respondents contested this claim, citing previous judgments that declared the petitioner's passbook void.
Findings of Court: The court found that the petitioner failed to prove ownership and must wait for the resolution of pending suits.
Issues: The main issues included the validity of pattadar passbooks issued during ongoing disputes and the authority of the police to conduct surveys amidst litigation.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the petitioner could not seek relief while ownership disputes were unresolved and emphasized the need for finality in legal proceedings before further actions could be taken.
Result: W.P. Nos. 30235 and 32928 of 2022 are dismissed; W.P. Nos. 30452 and 44081 of 2022 are allowed.
ORDER :
1. Heard Mr. Rapolu Bhaskar, learned counsel for the petitioner in W.P. Nos. 30235 and 32928 of 2022 and respondent No. 6 in W.P. No. 30452 of 2022 and respondent No. 8 in W.P. No. 44081 of 2022, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing on behalf of official respondents in all the writ petitions and Mr. E. Sreenivasa Rao, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 5 to 7 in W.P. No. 32928 of 2022 and respondent Nos. 6 and 7 in W.P. No. 30235 of 2022 and petitioners in W.P. Nos. 30452 and 44081 of 2022.
2. Lis involved in all the aforesaid writ petitions and the parties are one and the same with regard to dispute in respect of the land admeasuring Acs. 2.25 guntas in Survey No. 902, situated at Eduluru Village of Kattangur Mandal, Nalgonda District.
3. The respective petitioners have filed the respective writ petitions seeking the following reliefs:
(ii) W.P. No. 32928 of 2022: to declare the action of respondents Nos. 2 to 4 in proceeding to issue Pattadar passbook in favour of respondent Nos. 5 to 7 in respect of the petitioner’s agriculture land, admeasuring Acs. 2.25 guntas in Survey No. 902 of Edulu Village, Kattangur Madnal, Nalgonda District, during pendency of civil suits, as illegal and for a consequential direction to respondents Nos. 2 to 4 not to issue pattadar passbooks/ certificate etc. in favour of respondent Nos. 5 to 7 in respect of the above said land.
(iii) W.P. No. 30452 of 2022: to declare the letter dated 19.07.2022 addressed by the Sub-Inspector of Police, Kattangur Police Station to the Tahsildar, Kattangur, in respect of the subject land and to set aside the same.
(iv) W.P. No. 44081 of 2022: to call for the records in File No. A/379/21 and A/390/21 from the office of the Assistant Director, Survey and Land Records, Nalgonda (respondent No. 4) in respect of the subject land and quash the report dated 18.11.2021 issued by respondent No. 5-Deputy Inspector of Survey, Office of Revenue Divisional Officer, Nalgonda.
W.P. Nos. 30235 AND 32928 OF 2022
4. According to the petitioner, he is the absolute owner and possessor of the land admeasuring Acs. 2.25 guntas in Survey No. 902, situated at Edulu Village of Kattangur Mandal, Nalgonda District. Originally, his father, Mr. Venkaiah and his brothers had purchased the agriculture land to an extent of Acs. 10.24 guntas in Survey No. 902 of Edulu Village Shivar from one Mr. Narla Papaiah and Mr. Narla Narsaiah in the year 1972 for a valid consideration. Since the date of said purchase, they had been in peaceful possession and enjoyment over the said lands by way of cultivation. Their names were also mutated in revenue records and pattadar passbooks were issued in their favour:
(ii) While so, one Mr. Narla Meenaiah is also having land to an extent of Acs. 5.12 guntas in the very same survey number. Out of the said extent, he sold out an extent of Acs. 2.10 guntas to one Mr. Allam Anjaneyulu S/o Peda Veeraiah under a registered sale deed bearing document No. 1550 of 1985, dated 26.04.1985 of SRO, Nalgonda. Pursuant to the said sale
The court ruled that parties must await the resolution of pending suits regarding land ownership before seeking further legal relief, emphasizing the prohibition of actions that interfere with ongoin....
The survey and issuance of pattadar passbooks without adhering to principles of natural justice are invalid, necessitating proper notice and opportunity for all parties involved.
Point of law: When the quasi judicial authority entertained an Appeal, a writ of mandamus cannot be issued, since it is only to prohibition from proceeding with the appeal. Writ of Prohibition can be....
The court held that surveys affecting property rights must adhere to principles of natural justice, requiring notifications to all interested parties, particularly in urban properties under the ROR A....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.