IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
Surepalli Nanda, J.
Manga Somaraju – Petitioner
Versus
The Special Deputy Collector Tribal Welfare – Respondent
Writ Petition No.15843 of 2010
Decided On : 10-09-2024
(A) A.P. Scheduled Area Land Transfer Regulation – Articles 14, 19, 21, and 300-A of the Constitution of India – Writ Petition seeking to declare eviction orders as illegal and arbitrary – Petitioners claimed ownership and possession of land, asserting previous orders favored them – Respondents contended the land was government property and eviction was justified. (Paras 2-3, 9-10)
(B) Eviction Proceedings – The court emphasized the necessity of following due process of law before eviction – The petitioners have cultivated the land for 25 years without interference from authorities. (Paras 11-12)
Facts of the case: The petitioners claimed ownership of 15.20 acres of land in Naravarigudem village, asserting previous orders favored them against eviction attempts by respondents based on a 2007 order.
Findings of Court: The court directed respondents not to evict petitioners without due process, affirming their long-standing possession of the land.
Issues: The main issues were the validity of the eviction order and the rightful ownership of the land.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that eviction cannot occur without due process, recognizing the petitioners' long-term possession and the lack of proper legal basis for eviction.
Result: Writ Petition disposed of, directing no eviction without due process.
ORDER :
Surepalli Nanda, J.
Heard Sri Kiran Reddy Mallarapu, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Social Welfare appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 & 2 and Sri R.Sudhakara Naidu, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. 3 to 6.
2. The petitioners approached the Court seeking prayer as under:
3. The case of the petitioners as per the averments made by the petitioners in the affidavit filed by the petitioners in support of the present Writ Petition is as under:-
b) While things stood thus, the 6th respondent herein and Munugonda Venkamma, i.e the mother of the 3rd respondent had again filed LTR Case No. 13/1998/APT against petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 to evict from abovementioned subject land and the said proceedings were again dropped in favour of the petitioners vide order dated 24.02.2004 by the then Spl.Dy Collector (TW) Bhadrachalam.
c) Subsequently, the mother of respondent Nos. 3 and 4 herein and wife of 5th respondent herein filed CaseNo.306/2007/ ASPT on the file of the 1st respondent herein against the 1st petitioner for evicting the petitioners from S.No.385/1 admeasuring 10 acres of land of Naravarigudem village, Aswarapet Mandal, Khammam district and the 1st respondent vide order dated 28.09.2007 ordered the said eviction. Therefore, basing on the orders dated 28.09.2007, the respondents herein are forcing the petitioners to vacate from their lands and their subject premises.
d) Aggrieved by the order dated 28.09.2007, the petitioners had appeared before the 1st respondent stating that the said land belongs to the petitioners herein, but the 1st respondent had failed to consider the same. Moreover, the orders dated 28.09.2007 does not relate to the petitioners’ land. However, the action of the respondents herein in trying to evict the petitioners from their land is illegal, arbitrary and is contrary to the provisions of the A.P Scheduled Area Land Transfer Regulation and violative of articles 14, 19, 21, and 300A of the Constitution of India. Hence, the present Writ Petition is filed.
4. The counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of official respondent No.2 and para Nos. 4, 5, 10, 11 and 12 are extracted hereunder:-
Eviction from land requires adherence to due process of law, especially when long-term possession is established.
The judgment emphasizes the importance of adhering to principles of natural justice and providing a reasonable opportunity for the parties to present their case.
When there are two competing claims, one rooted in public interest and another relates to the protection of the rights of the individual, the cause of the public interest must be considered as overwh....
The court ruled that eviction of Scheduled Tribe individuals from their homes in scheduled areas, based on illegal proceedings, violates the Land Transfer Regulation.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the limitations of summary proceedings under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution in adjudicating disputes regarding possession and title of immo....
Writ jurisdiction is inappropriate for adjudicating disputes regarding property titles; such matters should be resolved through civil courts.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.