SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Telangana) 531

K. LAKSHMAN
Kummari Pochaiah – Appellant
Versus
Pilli Padma – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : SHYAM S AGRAWAL
For the Respondent: CH RAVINDER

ORDER :

Heard Mr. Shyam S. Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ch.Ravinder, learned counsel appearing for the respondent.

2. The present Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging the order dated 11.08.2023 passed in CMA No.18 of 2021 by the learned I Additional District Judge, Karimnagar.

(For sake of convenience, the petitioner herein is referred to as ‘defendant’ and respondent as ‘plaintiff ’)

FACTS:-

3. Plaintiff filed a suit vide O.S.No.171 of 2021 against the defendant seeking perpetual injunction restraining the defendant and his men from interfering with her possession over the suit schedule property i.e. land admeasuring Ac.0.35 ½ guntas in Sy.No.388/A situated Vedira Village, Ramadugu Mandal, Karimnagar District (for short, ‘subject property’) contending as follows:-

    i. Originally, in the revenue records, the entries were made in the name of Dulimitta Lachi Reddy s/o Rajaiah in respect of the subject property. The said Dulimitta Lachi Reddy, sold the subject property to one Bejjanki Yellaiah under a registered sale deed bearing document No.337 of 1982 dated 02.06.1982. The said Bejjanki Yellaiah sold the subject property to one Thodeti Bapu s/o Ashaiah, under

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top