Back
ANIL KUMAR JUKANTI
P. Meenaiah – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
ORDER :
This writ petition is filed praying to grant the following relief:
2. Brief facts:
Petitioners were working under the control of respondent No.3 on a consolidated pay of Rs.200/- per month. Petitioner No.1 was a Helper and has been working from 15.07.1985;
Employees completing five years of service before 25.11.1993 are entitled to pension benefits under G.O.Ms.No.212, without arrears of pay.
Service Law – Pension - In the absence of any exercise being done to ascertain clear vacancies, the delay on the part of the authorities cannot put the petitioners therein to prejudice
Pre-regularization service - claim of the employee should have been considered immediately if not through pre-regularization services and get counted for the purpose of terminal benefits
The petitioners cannot claim regularization of their services from the date of initial appointment and were entitled to count only half of their service rendered in consolidated pay posts for pension....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
