SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Telangana) 984

A. SANTHOSH REDDY
B. Swapna – Appellant
Versus
B. Gnaneswar – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: K.S. Murthy
For the Respondent: O. Manohar Reddy

Table of Content
1. context and background of the case (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. arguments of petitioner and respondent (Para 6 , 7)
3. legal issue for consideration (Para 8 , 9)
4. application of section 2(2) of the act (Para 10 , 11)
5. trial court's jurisdictional error (Para 12 , 13)
6. conclusion and outcome of the case (Para 14 , 15)

ORDER :

1. This Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is directed against the order, dated 15.03.2017, in I.A. No. 27 of 2016 in F.C.O.P. No. 249 of 2015 on the file of XV Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District at Miyapur.

2. The question in this petition is as to the applicability of the HINDU MARRIAGE ACT , 1955 (hereinafter referred as “the Act”) in respect of the parties, who belong to the ‘Yerukala’ community.

3. The marriage of the petitioner-Dr. B. Swapna and the respondent-Dr. B. Gnaneshwar was held on 03.11.2011 at YSR Gardens, Near Housing Board Colony, Hyderabad Chowrastha, Bhongir, Nalgonda District as per Hindu rites and customs. Both the parties are doctors by profession and they belong to ‘Yerukala’ community. The respondent filed petition seeking divorce under Section 13-1(ia) of the Act in F.C.O

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top