SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Telangana) 989

A. SANTHOSH REDDY
Dantaluri Venkatapathi Raju – Appellant
Versus
D. Rajeshwari Sirisha – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: S. Sridhar
For the Respondent: Gaddam Srinivas

Table of Content
1. civil revision petition procedural background. (Para 1 , 3)
2. arguments for and against additional written statement. (Para 4 , 5)
3. legal basis for filing additional pleadings. (Para 6 , 8 , 11)
4. prohibition against contradictory admissions. (Para 9 , 12)
5. court's reasoning on admissions in pleadings. (Para 10 , 13)
6. conclusion dismissing the civil revision petition. (Para 14 , 15 , 16)

ORDER :

1. This civil revision petition under Article 277 of the Constitution of India is directed against the order dated 02.08.2018 in I.A. No. 72 of 2018 in O.S. No. 71 of 2012, on the file of the VII Additional District Judge. Mahabubnagar, wherein the said application filed by the petitioner (defendant No. 1), under Order VIII Rule 9 read with Section 151 of the CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE (in short ‘CPC’ seeking to grant leave to file additional written statement, was dismissed.

2. Head learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the respondent No. 2. None appeared for respondent No. 1. Perused the record.

3. Respondent No. 1/plaintiff filed the suit O.S. No. 71 of 2012 for specific performance of agreement of sale dated 22.03.2012 against the petitioner/defen

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top