K. SARATH
M. Syamala – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Since both these writ petitions arise out of the common issue and the petitioner is one and the same they are being disposed of by this common order.
2. Heard Sri Botla Venkateswara Rao, learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies for the official respondent and Ms. Devara Samhitha, learned Counsel for the respondent No. 4 in W.P. No. 17946 of 2023.
3. W.P. No. 28311 of 2021 is filed seeking to declare the Notification bearing Rc. No. C/480/2021 dated 25.10.2021 issued by the respondent No. 2 calling for the applications for appointment of Fair Price Shop Dealer of Shop No. 2287001 situated at Sathupalli Village, Sathupalli Mandal, Khammam District without following the reservation policy as provided under law and without considering the applications dated 13.09.2021 and 01.11.2021 of the petitioner for continuing her as Fair Price Shop Dealer of the said shop as illegal and arbitrary.
4. This Court passed interim orders dated 12.11.2024 in W.P. No. 28311 of 2021 and directed the respondents to dispose of the representations filed by the petitioner dated 13.09.2021 and 01.11.2021.
5. Thereafter, the petitioner filed W.P. No. 179
The court upheld that temporary appointments do not guarantee permanent positions, especially when eligibility criteria are not met.
The court emphasized the necessity of due process and natural justice in administrative appointments, ruling against arbitrary actions by authorities.
Point of Law - Order impugned is not in existence and the writ petition has become infructuous as the present cancellation order was passed by issuing show-cause notice and by considering the explana....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.