T. VINOD KUMAR
Adarsh Bio-Tech Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Srinivasa Polymers – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. interlocutory application for evidence. (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. need for expert witness in evidentiary matters. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. procedure for summoning witnesses under cpc. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. criminal evidence admissible in civil proceedings. (Para 12 , 17 , 18 , 20) |
| 5. review of expert testimony and report's relevancy. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 19 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 6. dismissal of revision petition. (Para 24 , 25) |
ORDER :
1. This Civil Revision Petition is filed aggrieved by the order dated 08.07.2023 in I.A. No. 422 of 2023 in O.S. No. 378 of 2014 passed by the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, at Mechal.
2. Heard Sri. C. Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.
3. The petitioners herein are the Defendants No. 1 & 2 in the suit filed for recovery of money by the Respondent No. 1 herein as plaintiff.
4. The Respondent No. 1 herein, filed an interlocutory application in the suit under Order 16 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short ‘the Code’) seeking to summon the ‘Assistant Director, State Forensic Laboratory Telangana State, at Red Hills’ along with FSL Report/Opinion vide Report file No
Iqbal Singh Marwah vs. Meenakshi Marwah
Lakshmi and Others vs. Chinnammal and Others
Mitthulal and Another vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Ram Jatan Rai vs. Sita Ram Singh and Others
State of Himachal Pradesh vs. Jai Lal
Smt. Rita Pandit vs. Atul Pandit
Uday Shankar Triyar vs. Ram Kalewar Prasad Singh and Another
The main legal point established is that the trial court correctly applied the provisions of Cr.P.C. 293 and 294, and the requirements for secondary evidence under the Evidence Act 65 in directing th....
The court confirmed that Section 311 CrPC permits summoning additional witnesses at any stage of trial, emphasizing its role in ensuring just decisions absent prejudice to the accused.
The judgment emphasizes the limited scope of supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and the restricted nature of the High Court's interference in the decisions of inf....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.