SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Telangana) 966

T. VINOD KUMAR
Adarsh Bio-Tech Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Srinivasa Polymers – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: C. Kumar

Table of Content
1. interlocutory application for evidence. (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. need for expert witness in evidentiary matters. (Para 6 , 7)
3. procedure for summoning witnesses under cpc. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
4. criminal evidence admissible in civil proceedings. (Para 12 , 17 , 18 , 20)
5. review of expert testimony and report's relevancy. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 19 , 21 , 22 , 23)
6. dismissal of revision petition. (Para 24 , 25)

ORDER :

1. This Civil Revision Petition is filed aggrieved by the order dated 08.07.2023 in I.A. No. 422 of 2023 in O.S. No. 378 of 2014 passed by the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, at Mechal.

2. Heard Sri. C. Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.

3. The petitioners herein are the Defendants No. 1 & 2 in the suit filed for recovery of money by the Respondent No. 1 herein as plaintiff.

4. The Respondent No. 1 herein, filed an interlocutory application in the suit under Order 16 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short ‘the Code’) seeking to summon the ‘Assistant Director, State Forensic Laboratory Telangana State, at Red Hills’ along with FSL Report/Opinion vide Report file No

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top