SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 6 Supreme(Telangana) 723

N. TUKARAMJI
V. Limba Reddy – Appellant
Versus
V. Raja Gangamani – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : N. Srushman Reddy
For the Respondents: Srinivas Velagapudi

ORDER :

N. Tukaramji, J.

1. As these three revision petitions are intertwined, they are heard together and are disposed of by way of this common order.

2. Heard Mr.N. Srushman Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Srinivas Velagapudi, learned counsel for the respondents.

3. Briefly stated the relevant facts are that, the revision petitioner as plaintiff filed O.s. No. 66 of 2015 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Nizamabad for declaration of title of the suit schedule property and perpetual injunction against the respondent Nos. 1 to 4. Pending proceedings the revision petitioner has filed the Interlocutory Application Nos. 571, 572 and 573 of 2022 whereby prayed for reopening the plaintiff's evidence, to receive the documents and to recall the P.W.1 to mark the received document on behalf of the plaintiff. The trial Court vide impugned order dated 28.12.2023 dismissed all the petitions. Aggrieved thereby the present revision has been filed.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit the documents which are intended to bring on record are found while shifting the house. Further as he was unaware of these documents by the date of filing of the suit, reference of these

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top