SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Telangana) 37

CHALLA KODANDA RAM
K. Madhumathi – Appellant
Versus
K. Ramachander Rao – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Sri. Shyam S. Agarwal.
For the Respondent: Sri. S. Praveen Goud.

ORDER :

1. This Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging the order dated 09.07.2018 in I.A. No. 300 of 2018 in O.S. No. 1694 of 2010 passed by the learned VIII Additional Senior Civil Judge, Rangareddy District at L.B. Nagar.

2. The petitioner herein is the plaintiff who filed the suit for perpetual injunction with respect to the suit schedule property. The I.A. was purported to be filed under Rule 32 (2) of the Civil Rules of Practice.

3. The case of the petitioner is that she has been suffering from ailments, hence, unable to prosecute the case effectively on her own/to appear before the Court to give evidence; that as a matter of fact, her husband is looking after the affairs of the property since beginning and he is well-versed with the same and the legal proceedings and in view of her inability, she had executed a deed of General Power of Attorney in favour of her husband Sri. K. Prem Ra S/o Sri. K. Laksman authorizing him to act on her behalf and he is the only competent person to take care of the suit. Hence, she prayed the Court to permit the General Power of Attorney holder to represent her and prosecute the case on her behalf. The prayer in the petition reads as “the Cou

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top