Back
K. SURENDER
Mohd. Fayazuddin, Vikarabad Vandm – Appellant
Versus
State Of Telangana, Rep Pp – Respondent
ORDER :
Crl.P.No.892 of 2015:
1. This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short “Cr.P.C”) to call for the entire records in C.C.No.600 of 2014 pending on the file of Judicial First Class Magistrate, Vikarabad, Ranga Reddy District and to quash the same. The petitioners are arrayed as Accused Nos.5 and 6. The offences alleged against the 1st petitioner (A5) is under Sections 498-A of Indian Penal Code and under Sections 3 & 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act and against the 2nd petitioner (A6) is under Sections 498-A and 109 of IPC.
Crl.P.No.80 of 2015:
2. This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short “Cr.P.C”) to call for the entire records in C.C.No.600 of 2014 pending on the file of Judicial First Class Magistrate, Vikarabad, Ranga Reddy District and to quash the same. The petitioners are arrayed as Accused Nos.2, 3 and 4. The offences alleged against the petitioners herein are under Sections 498-A of Indian Penal Code and under Sections 3 & 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.
3. Since the petitioners in both the Criminal Petitions are Accused Nos.2 to 6 in the very same Crime No.84 of 2012 and all th
Specific allegations are required for prosecution under dowry laws; vague claims against relatives are insufficient.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
