UJJAL BHUYAN, C. V. BHASKAR REDDY
Bharatiya Janata Party – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Ujjal Bhuyan, J.
Heard Mr. Vaidyanathan Chitambaram, learned Senior Counsel for the appellant and Mr. Dushyant Dave, learned Senior Counsel representing respondents No.1 to 5.
2. This appeal is directed against the order dated 08.11.2022 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.39767 of 2022 filed by the appellant as the writ petitioner.
3. By the aforesaid order, learned Single Judge held that investigation could not be stalled for an indefinite period and that the Court was not inclined to continue further with the interim order dated 29.10.2022 Accordingly, the police were permitted to go ahead with the investigation. It is against this order that the present appeal has been filed.
4. Appellant before us is the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), Telangana State Unit. It is stated that on 26.10.2022, a first information was lodged by respondent No.8 alleging that on 06.09.2022 two out of the three accused persons viz., Ramachandra Bharati @ Satish Sharma and Nanda Kumar had met the informant and started negotiations with him not to contest as a candidate from the Telangana Rashtra Samithi (TRS) party; instead he was asked to join BJP party by resigning from the TRS party.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.