Back
SUREPALLI NANDA
D. Uppalaiah – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
ORDER:
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Government Pleader for Services II and learned standing counsel for respondents.
2. This Writ Petition is filed to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in issuing the Proceedings No. 37/CPR&RE/C2/2015, dated 27.10.2015 in not regularized the service of the Petitioners as regularized the service of the one of the members of the union Md. Masood Ali, Bore-well Mechanic, working on the basis of NMR at both, Adilabad District through G.O.Rt. No. 182, dated 14.03.2017 as illegal, arbitrary, highly discriminatory, unjust, unfair, irrational, unconstitutional, unlawful and against to Articles 12, 14, 16, 19, 21 and 23 of the Constitution of India and against to the principles of natural justice and against to the G.O.Ms. No. 212, Finance Department, dated 22.04.1994 and against to a catena of Judgments of the Apex Court and set aside the same, Consequently direct the 1st respondent to regularize the service of the petitioners as regularized th
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the engagement of workers through outsourcing agencies must comply with the law laid down in relevant cases and statutory provisions. The cour....
The court mandated regularization for longtime temporary employees, emphasizing that states must adhere to constitutional employment principles regarding service continuity after a decade of service.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
