Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
SUREPALLI NANDA
Mohammed Ahmed – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's request for regularization of service. (Para 2) |
| 2. petitioner's legal arguments based on precedent cases. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's analysis of precedents regarding regularization. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. establishment of considerations for granting regularization. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 5. final order directing consideration for regularization. (Para 24 , 25 , 26) |
ORDER:
SUREPALLI NANDA, J.
Heard Sri CH.Ganesh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services-II appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos.1 to 3 and Sri Pradeep Reddy Katta, learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos.4 & 5.
2. The petitioner approached the Court seeking prayer as under:
to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to treat the services of the petitioner as regular one in the last grade post for continuously working till date in temporary post of last grade in contingent establishment on compassionate grounds from 05/07/1988 nor regularizing his services even on completion of 34 l
The court mandated regularization for longtime temporary employees, emphasizing that states must adhere to constitutional employment principles regarding service continuity after a decade of service.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
