Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI, TIRUMALA DEVI EADA
Lao Asifabad – Appellant
Versus
Tudur Vittal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. market value of acquired land must reflect surrounding sale values. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 2. trial court's market value enhancement based on inadequate evidence. (Para 7 , 10) |
| 3. arguments regarding compensation taken by land acquisition officer and claimants. (Para 8) |
| 4. comparison with past case judgments enhances validity. (Para 9) |
| 5. court's examination and justification for compensation levels. (Para 11) |
| 6. judicial findings require no interference based on evidence. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 7. conclusion: appeal is dismissed; prior order upheld. (Para 14) |
JUDGMENT :
(Tirumala Devi Eada, J.)
This appeal, under Section 54 of the LAND ACQUISITION ACT , 1894, (for short ‘the Act’) is preferred by the Land Acquisition Officer, Sub-Collector, Asifabad, Adilabad District, aggrieved by the order and decree dated 22.12.2010 passed in O.P.No.58 of 2000 by the learned Senior Civil Judge at Asifabad (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Reference Court’). X-Objections No.18411 OF 2011 are filed by the claimants.
2. For convenience and clarity, the parties herein are referred to as they were arrayed before the Reference Court.
3. The facts of the case in brief are that the Mandal Revenue Officer, Kagha
Compensation for land acquisition must reflect fair market value, as evidenced by relevant sales statistics, ensuring just compensation to claimants.
Compensation for acquired lands must reflect fair market value, and similar lands should not receive disparate compensation.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
