IN THE HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
K.SURENDER, E.V.VENUGOPAL
Jadhav Dilip – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(K. Surender, J.)
1. The Appeal is filed by the appellant/accused, aggrieved by the judgment dated 26.10.2018 in S.C.No.76 of 2016, on the file of the Principal Sessions Judge at Adilabad. The appellant was convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302 of IPC and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment for murdering his wife, Rathod Shoba Bai.
2. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and Sri Arun Kumar Dodla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State.
3. On 04.06.2015, around 3:30 p.m., P.W.1, who is the son of the deceased’s sister, went to the Police Station and lodged a complaint alleging that he came to know that the appellant quarreled with the deceased, suspecting her fidelity and hit her on the head with an axe. He immediately rushed to the deceased’s house and found her in an unconscious state in a pool of blood. She was immediately shifted to the hospital. At the time of shifting the deceased to the hospital, his mother/P.W.5, cousin brother/P.W.2, and P.W.6 were present.
4. On the basis of information given by P.W.1, the crime was registered by P.W.17 and the FIR was dispatched to the concerned Magistrate. Thereafter, he went to the scene
Subramaniam v. State of Tamilnadu
Circumstantial evidence must satisfy strict principles to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt; failure to do so warrants setting aside of conviction.
The sufficiency of circumstantial evidence to establish guilt and the principles of circumstantial evidence.
In criminal cases relying on circumstantial evidence, the prosecution must prove each circumstance beyond reasonable doubt, and the evidence must form a complete chain that excludes other hypotheses ....
For a conviction based on circumstantial evidence, every link in the chain must be established beyond reasonable doubt; mere confessions are inadequate without corroborative evidence.
Prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, and circumstantial evidence needs a complete chain indicating the accused's guilt; extra-judicial confessions require corroboration and cannot so....
Conviction based on circumstantial evidence requires a complete and cogent chain of circumstances; extra-judicial confessions must be corroborated by reliable evidence.
Circumstantial evidence must form a complete chain pointing to guilt; absence of direct evidence and reliance on a single unreliable witness led to acquittal.
Conviction based solely on circumstantial evidence requires a complete and coherent chain of events that excludes all reasonable hypotheses of innocence.
In murder cases based on circumstantial evidence, each link must be established beyond reasonable doubt, with all evidence consistently pointing to the guilt of the accused.
The court reaffirmed that conviction based solely on circumstantial evidence requires clear establishment of motive, last seen theory, and connections through unbroken chains of evidence.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.