SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Telangana) 507

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA 
MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA, B.R. MADHUSUDHAN RAO, JJ. 
Ms. Varada Rukmini Devi - Appellant
Vs.
Mr. Varada Gopi - Respondent
F.C.A. No.240 of 2015
Decided On : 22-04-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. S.Vijaya Prashanth
For the Respondent:  Mr. C.M.R.Velu

Judicial separation can be granted on grounds of mental cruelty, including threats and physical abuse, as established by evidence in the case.

Headnote:(A) Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Section 10 - Judicial separation - Appeal against decree of judicial separation granted by Family Court - Respondent/husband alleged mental cruelty by appellant/wife, including threats of suicide and physical abuse - Appellant/wife contended she was subjected to harassment and had love for her husband - Trial Court found sufficient evidence of cruelty - No grounds to set aside the decree. (Paras 1, 5, 10.1, 22, 24)

(B) Mental Cruelty - Definition and implications - Threatening suicide and physical abuse constitute mental cruelty, justifying judicial separation. (Paras 16, 21)

Facts of the case:
The appeal arises from a decree of judicial separation granted to the respondent/husband, who claimed mental cruelty by the appellant/wife, including threats and physical abuse. The appellant/wife countered with allegations of harassment and claimed to have lived with love for her husband.

Findings of Court:
The Trial Court found that the respondent/husband had established his case of mental cruelty, leading to the decree of judicial separation.

Issues: The main issues were whether the respondent/husband proved grounds for judicial separation and whether the Trial Court's findings were perverse.

Ratio Decidendi: The court upheld the Trial Court's findings, stating that the evidence of mental cruelty was sufficient to justify the decree of judicial separation.

Result: Appeal dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

(B.R. Madhusudhan Rao, J.)

1. This appeal is filed by the appellant/wife aggrieved by the order passed by the learned Family Court Judge, at LB Nagar, Ranga Reddy District in O.P.No.465 of 2010, dated 18.08.2015 by granting a decree of judicial separation on the application filed by the respondent/husband under Section 10 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

2.1. It is stated in the O.P. filed by the respondent/husband that his marriage with the appellant/wife was performed on 24.04.1992 as per Hindu Rites and Customs, at Chaitanyapuri Colony, Hyderabad and they are not blessed with children. From the date of marriage, the appellant/wife never cared the respondent/husband nor performed her obligations as a wife in the matrimonial society. Appellant/wife is working as Assistant in Deaf and Dumb Government School at Miryalaguda and was drawing a salary of Rs.25,000/- per month and she used to look down the respondent/husband, who is working as a Typist in GHMC. Appellant/wife is educated better than the respondent/husband, that is also a reason to look down him by his wife. Appellant/wife has lodged a complaint under Section 498-A of IPC against the respondent/husband and his parents at PS Saroornagar on 26.04.2007 only to harass them, at a later point of time, the said compliant has been withdrawn.

2.2. Parents of the respondent/husband are aged about 75 years and 60 years, the appellant/wife used to behave abnormally with the family members and used filthy language which caused mental depression apart from tension. Sister-in-law of the appellant lodged a complaint against the appellant/wife and her brother under Section 498-A of IPC unable to bear the torture. It is further contended in the O.P. that respondent/husband paid an amount of Rs.1,05,000/- by way of cheque to his wife in the name of one B.Narahari for purchasing a Flat at Lakshmi Apartments at Saroornagar in the year 1999. Parents of the appellant/wife never gave her any dowry in the form of cash or gold. Appellant/wife was not interested in children and she underwent abortion without his consent. Respondent/husband is unable to live in peace and is in distress due to the behaviour of his wife, which is beyond his control and his marriage is broken down beyond redemption and prayed to grant decree of judicial separation.

3.1. Appellant/wife filed counter in the O.P. filed by her husband and contended that her parents gave Rs.1,00,000/- in the form of cash, presented five tulas of gold, furniture, household articles as per the demands of her husband and his family members. Appellant/wife was working in a Residential School for Deaf and Dumb at Miryalaguda, at the time of marriage respondent/husband and his family members have put a condition that she has to hand over all her salary to run the family so that they can lead happy life. Respondent/husband and his parents are greedy for money and they use to take her entire salary without providing basic necessities. Appellant/wife is drawing more salary than of her husband and she never acted in a superior manner and degraded her husband. Appellant/wife was transferred to Hyderabad in the month of October, 1993, during that time her husband and his family members were instigating her to hand over her entire salary. In the year 1994, they put up a separate family, but the respondent/husband never used to give money to run the house.

3.2. Respondent/husband used to beat her by picking up quarrel with her without no reason and he got addicted to bad voices and was harassing her for demanding for a marriage with her sister for begetting children when her sister’s marriage was fixed and he created a big scene thereat. Appellant/wife is paying the housing loan installments and her husband has demanded her to sell the Flat to build a house in the Plot belonging to him, with great difficulty, she has provided Rs.1,00,000/- to her husband by subscribing in a chit and thereafter, her husband has constructed a house, celebrated Ho

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top