IN THE HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA, B.R. MADHUSUDHAN RAO, JJ.
Ms. Varada Rukmini Devi - Appellant
Vs.
Mr. Varada Gopi - Respondent
F.C.A. No.240 of 2015
Decided On : 22-04-2025
JUDGMENT :
(B.R. Madhusudhan Rao, J.)
1. This appeal is filed by the appellant/wife aggrieved by the order passed by the learned Family Court Judge, at LB Nagar, Ranga Reddy District in O.P.No.465 of 2010, dated 18.08.2015 by granting a decree of judicial separation on the application filed by the respondent/husband under Section 10 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
2.1. It is stated in the O.P. filed by the respondent/husband that his marriage with the appellant/wife was performed on 24.04.1992 as per Hindu Rites and Customs, at Chaitanyapuri Colony, Hyderabad and they are not blessed with children. From the date of marriage, the appellant/wife never cared the respondent/husband nor performed her obligations as a wife in the matrimonial society. Appellant/wife is working as Assistant in Deaf and Dumb Government School at Miryalaguda and was drawing a salary of Rs.25,000/- per month and she used to look down the respondent/husband, who is working as a Typist in GHMC. Appellant/wife is educated better than the respondent/husband, that is also a reason to look down him by his wife. Appellant/wife has lodged a complaint under Section 498-A of IPC against the respondent/husband and his parents at PS Saroornagar on 26.04.2007 only to harass them, at a later point of time, the said compliant has been withdrawn.
2.2. Parents of the respondent/husband are aged about 75 years and 60 years, the appellant/wife used to behave abnormally with the family members and used filthy language which caused mental depression apart from tension. Sister-in-law of the appellant lodged a complaint against the appellant/wife and her brother under Section 498-A of IPC unable to bear the torture. It is further contended in the O.P. that respondent/husband paid an amount of Rs.1,05,000/- by way of cheque to his wife in the name of one B.Narahari for purchasing a Flat at Lakshmi Apartments at Saroornagar in the year 1999. Parents of the appellant/wife never gave her any dowry in the form of cash or gold. Appellant/wife was not interested in children and she underwent abortion without his consent. Respondent/husband is unable to live in peace and is in distress due to the behaviour of his wife, which is beyond his control and his marriage is broken down beyond redemption and prayed to grant decree of judicial separation.
3.1. Appellant/wife filed counter in the O.P. filed by her husband and contended that her parents gave Rs.1,00,000/- in the form of cash, presented five tulas of gold, furniture, household articles as per the demands of her husband and his family members. Appellant/wife was working in a Residential School for Deaf and Dumb at Miryalaguda, at the time of marriage respondent/husband and his family members have put a condition that she has to hand over all her salary to run the family so that they can lead happy life. Respondent/husband and his parents are greedy for money and they use to take her entire salary without providing basic necessities. Appellant/wife is drawing more salary than of her husband and she never acted in a superior manner and degraded her husband. Appellant/wife was transferred to Hyderabad in the month of October, 1993, during that time her husband and his family members were instigating her to hand over her entire salary. In the year 1994, they put up a separate family, but the respondent/husband never used to give money to run the house.
3.2. Respondent/husband used to beat her by picking up quarrel with her without no reason and he got addicted to bad voices and was harassing her for demanding for a marriage with her sister for begetting children when her sister’s marriage was fixed and he created a big scene thereat. Appellant/wife is paying the housing loan installments and her husband has demanded her to sell the Flat to build a house in the Plot belonging to him, with great difficulty, she has provided Rs.1,00,000/- to her husband by subscribing in a chit and thereafter, her husband has constructed a house, celebrated Ho
Judicial separation can be granted on grounds of mental cruelty, including threats and physical abuse, as established by evidence in the case.
The court's decision to grant judicial separation was based on vague and general allegations of cruelty, which were not substantiated. The court erred in granting judicial separation without proper e....
Judicial separation cannot be granted without proven grounds as defined in S.10 of the Hindu Marriage Act.
The court established that a spouse's long-term separation and failure to reconcile can constitute grounds for divorce based on cruelty and desertion under the Hindu Marriage Act.
The husband's claims of cruelty were insufficient to establish grounds for divorce, leading the court to grant judicial separation instead, recognizing the potential for reconciliation.
Point of Law : Merely because respondent has sought for maintenance or has filed a complaint against the petitioner for the offence punishable under Section 498-A of IPC, they cannot be said to be va....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of the concept of mental cruelty under Section 13(1)(i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, and the consideration of irretrievable b....
Long-term separation and acquittal from false allegations can constitute mental cruelty under Section 13(1)(i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, justifying divorce.
The court established that wrongful criminal allegations can constitute mental cruelty justifying a divorce under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.