Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
N.TUKARAMJI
Singireddy Srinivas Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
ORDER:
N. TUKARAMJI, J.
Heard Mr. K. Venumadhav, learned counsel for petitioner/accused and Mr.Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent No.1-State.
2. This petition is filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, ‘CrPC’) for quashment of charge sheet in Sessions Case No.70 of 2020 on the file of the Additional Senior Civil Judge-cum-Assistant Sessions Judge, Bhongir.
3. The petitioner is arrayed as an accused for the offence under Section 306 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE ,1860 (for short, ‘IPC’).
4. The relevant facts in brief are that on 15.05.2019 one Enugu Linga Reddy/de facto complainant lodged police report stating that his son/Enugu Mahender Reddy/deceased in June, 2016 had purchased Ashok Leyland Borewell vehicle bearing Registration No.TS-05-EP-1377 in partnership with his son-in-law/accused. However, the vehicle was registered in the name of his son-in-law. Later, on 07.07.2018 the partners had entered into an agreement and accordingly his son/deceased paid the entire monthly instalments till 16.04.2019. As per the agreement his son-in- law/accused should hand over the borewell vehicle along with no o
To establish abetment of suicide under IPC Section 306, there must be clear intent or instigation from the accused leading to the victim's suicide, which was not met in this case.
To sustain a charge under Section 306 IPC, clear evidence of intentional abetment or instigation is required, with actions having a proximate link to the suicide.
To establish abetment of suicide under IPC Section 306, there must be clear evidence of instigation or a direct act by the accused that leads the victim to take their life.
For a conviction under Section 306 IPC, clear mens rea and direct acts of instigation or aid are required, and mere allegations of harassment are insufficient to establish abetment.
For a charge under Section 306 IPC, there must be clear evidence of instigation or abetment linked to the victim's suicide; mere allegations of harassment are insufficient.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of specific intent and the absence of evidence of instigation or intentional aid in the commission of suicide under Section 306 of ....
(1) Abetment of suicide – Act of abetment must be proved and established by prosecution before he could be convicted under Section 306 IPC.(2) Hyperboles employed in exchanges should not, without any....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
