SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Telangana) 658

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD 
NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA, J.
Shashank Mehrotra - Appellant 
Vs.
The Hyderabad Cricket Association - Respondent 
Writ Petition No. 34349 of 2023 
Decided on : 03-04-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : SYED MANSOOR
For the Respondent: N GANGADHAR

The imposition of a ban by the CEO of the Hyderabad Cricket Association was arbitrary and violated principles of natural justice due to lack of authority and procedural adherence.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 417, 468, 471, 474 read with Section 34 - Hyderabad Cricket Association Rules and Regulations, 2018 - Ban imposed on player for alleged submission of fake documents - The court found the ban arbitrary and against principles of natural justice, as the CEO lacked authority to impose such a ban without following due process. (Paras 1, 10, 15)

(B) Natural Justice - The principles of natural justice require that a party must be given a fair opportunity to present their case before any adverse action is taken against them. (Paras 10, 15)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, a cricketer, was banned for five years by the Hyderabad Cricket Association based on a police report alleging submission of a fake birth certificate. The petitioner contended that the ban was arbitrary and lacked proper procedural adherence.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the CEO of the Association acted beyond his powers and failed to follow the necessary procedures before imposing the ban.

Issues: The main issues were whether the CEO had the authority to impose a ban and whether the principles of natural justice were followed.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the CEO exceeded his authority and that the ban was imposed without proper inquiry or adherence to the rules, thus violating the principles of natural justice.

Result: Writ Petition allowed; the ban set aside.

ORDER :

NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA, J.

Petitioner seeks to declare the action of the 1st respondent - Hyderabad Cricket Association imposing ban of five years vide letter dated 11.10.2023 on petitioner to play cricket in all formats as arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice. Consequently, a direction is sought to respondents to allow petitioner to participate in the cricket tournaments hosted by the 1st respondent - Association.

2. The brief case of petitioner is that he is representing the 2nd respondent - Club and also India-D team in U-19 one day challenger in 2021-22 and also India-B team in U-19 triangular series. While matter stood thus, the 1st respondent lodged a report with the Police, Uppal under Rachakonda Commissionerate who registered Crime No. 1134 of 2023 for the offences under Sections 417, 468, 471, 474 read with Section 34 of IPC on 09.10.2023. In the said crime, petitioner obtained Anticipatory bail from this Court on 17.11.2023. The basis for the 1st respondent Association to suspend/impose ban on petitioner is the report given by the Commissioner of Police dated 07.10.2023.

3. The Chief Executive Officer of the 1st respondent filed counter to the Writ Petition opposing the relief sought by petitioner. It is contended that the Association is functioning under the aegis of Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) and it is governed by its Memorandum of Association and Rules and Regulations, 2018. The Chief Executive Officer relied upon Rules 2 and 16 of the Rules and Regulations, 2018 which are extracted hereunder:

2. HEADQUARTERS

The Headquarters of the HCA shall be located at Hyderabad.

16. HCA JURISDICTION OVER PLAYERS, MATCH OFFICIALS & TEAM OFFICIALS OF MEMBERS

The HCA shall have concurrent jurisdiction and control over Players. Match Officials and Team Officials within the jurisdiction of a Member. Such individuals participating in cricket under the aegis of a Member shall be deemed ipso facto to submit to the jurisdiction of the HCA.”

It is the further case of the 1st respondent that on scrutinizing the documents provided by the players including Petitioner, they found certain discrepancies, as such a requisition was made by the Association with the Commissioner of Police Hyderabad vide letter dated 30.09.2023 to verify the genuineness of documents submitted by the players. Basing on the said requisition, the Commissioner seems to have conducted an enquiry and submitted the report to the 1st respondent vide letter dated 07.10.2023 wherein petitioner’s name was reflected at Serial No. 5. Relying on the said report, the 1st respondent lodged a report with the police and Crime No. 1134 of 2023 was registered for the offences under Section 417, 468, 471, 474 read with Section 34 IPC . The Association concluded that petitioner submitted a fake birth certificate which resulted in his suspension.

4. Heard Sri P. Raja Sripathi Rao, learned Senior Counsel appearing for Sri Syed Mansoor, learned counsel for petitioner as well as Sri S. Ashok Anand Kumar, learned Senior Counsel on behalf of Sri N. Gangadhar, learned Standing Counsel for HCA and Sri Zeeshan Adnan Mahmood, learned counsel for the 2nd respondent.

5. For adjudication of this lis, it is necessary to consider the rules and regulations of the 1st respondent, relevant of which are extracted hereunder:

“1. (A) DEFINATION

c. “APEX COUNCIL” is the principal body of the HCA tasked with its governance as set out in Rule 14.

e. “HCA” means “The Hyderabad Circket Association” in Telangana Regd under the A.P.(TA) Public Societies Registration Act, 1350 Fasli (Act 1 of 1350 Fasli) bearing Registration No.207/1961. "CEO" is the Chief Executive Officer of the HCA appointed by the Apex Council as set out in Rule 23.

w. “PLAYER” is any Cricketer past or present registered with HCA or any of its Members as a player and shall Include any person selected in any squad to represent HCA in a Test Match, ODI tour match, Twenty/20 or Junior Tournament Match or any Match cond

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top