SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Telangana) 653

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD  NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA, J.
Mr. Chirag Yadav - Appellant
Vs.
The State of Telangana - Respondent
Writ Petition No. 34978 of 2024
Decided on : 03-04-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : B NISHITHA
For the Respondent: GP FOR SPORTS

A ban imposed on a player without proper inquiry and notice violates natural justice and is deemed arbitrary and illegal.

Headnote:(A) Cricket (Laws and Regulations) - Guidelines of the BCCI - Ban imposed on player for alleged submission of fake documents - The petitioner challenged a two-year ban imposed without a formal inquiry or notice, arguing violation of natural justice and absence of transparency. The investigation into the authenticity of documents was inconclusive, leading to a determination of illegality in the ban. (Paras 3, 4, 10, 25)

(B) Administrative Law - Fairness in procedures - The court reiterated the principle that any administrative action affecting rights must adhere to the principles of natural justice and transparency, emphasizing the need for inquiry reports to be conclusive and substantiated. (Paras 4, 22)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, a cricketer registered with the BCCI, was banned for two years on claims of providing a fake birth certificate without being afforded an opportunity to defend himself. The ban was communicated via email, and the inquiry process faced scrutiny for lack of transparency and procedural integrity.

Findings of Court:
The court found the imposition of the ban illegal due to failure to provide proper notice, a fair hearing, and reliance on inconclusive investigative reports. The court stated that such actions were arbitrary and breached the procedural safeguards set out in the governing guidelines.

Issues: The legality of the ban imposed without proper inquiry was central, along with the conformity of the action to principles of natural justice.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that a unilateral action like imposing a ban for submitting allegedly fake documents, without prior notice or a definitive finding from a fair inquiry, is unconstitutional and against established administrative laws of fairness and transparency.

Result: Writ Petition allowed; the ban imposed was lifted and respondents directed to act in line with legal guidelines.

ORDER :

NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA, J.

Heard Sri P. Raja Sripathi Rao, learned Senior Counsel on behalf of Ms. B. Nishitha, learned counsel for petitioner, Sri S. Ashok Anand Kumar, learned Senior Counsel on behalf of HCA and Sri C. Damodar Reddy, learned Senior Counsel on behalf of Sri S. Abhaya Kumar Sagar, learned Standing Counsel BCCI.

2. Petitioner is before this Court to declare the ban imposed on him for two years, effective from 04.11.2024 to 03.11.2026 and preventing him to play the tournaments conducted by Respondents 2 and 3 as illegal and violation of his rights.

3. It is the case of Petitioner that he is highly-skilled and playing cricket for nearly a decade, with outstanding credentials, diligence, and accomplishments in various state and national-level tournaments. In 2021, he was registered with the 2nd respondent - BCCI vide ID No.18774, in full compliance with their guidelines and regulations and since then, he played for various tournaments representing the State of Telangana; in October 2024, he was the captain of Hyderabad team for Under-19 for the tournament Vinoo Mankad Trophy held at Mohali. The grievance of Petitioner is that Respondents 2 and 3 have arbitrarily imposed a two-year ban and the same is communicated vide e mail dated 14.11.2024 to petitioner’s address (chiragvalid123@gmail.com). The action the 2nd respondent is impugned in this Writ Petition.

4. The contention of petitioner is that without issuing any formal notice or conducting a fair inquiry and in violation of principles of natural justice, respondents imposed ban and there is no opportunity given to him to present his defence and to be heard despite sending multiple e mails requesting to furnish a copy of report of the police based on which ban was imposed. According to petitioner, imposing ban is a unilateral decision and violates his rights and undermines the very essence of fairness and transparency in administrative actions.

5. In the e mail dated 14.11.2024 addressed to petitioner by the Secretary of the 3rd respondent – Association, it is informed that enquiry was initiated by the 3rd respondent with the 6th respondent to verify the documentation submitted by Petitioner with the 3rd respondent and based on the findings of the said investigation, the 3rd respondent submitted report to BCCI for appropriate action as per their guidelines, which consequently, imposed ban on petitioner for submitting fake document effective from 04.11.2024 till 03.11.2026 in all tournaments and after completion of ban period, petitioner would be eligible to participate in senior men's tournaments.

6. Petitioner relies upon the guidelines issued by the 2nd respondent. Guideline No. 4 (iii) explicitly mentioned that players who were registered on line by Association concerned in any of the seasons from 2018-19 to 2023-24, need not register again using the “common form”. Petitioner being a registered player since 2021-22 season is under the category of “Registered Players” as defined by the guidelines of the 2nd respondent. Thereby there is no necessity for petitioner to undergo any fresh registration process for the subsequent seasons. However, he had provided all the relevant documents to substantiate the same showing his existing registration as Player ID: 18774. Guideline No. 4 is extracted hereunder:-

“4. Online Registration of fresh and Registered player (men & women) (or 2024-25 season

i. As you are aware that the season 2018-19 is the benchmark for all players registration purposes, therefore, a player who is registered online by the concerned Association during the season 2018-19 will not have to fill this common form for the subsequent cricket seasons.

ii. Fresh players are those players who are not registered online in the season 2018-19, 2019-20, 2020-21, 2021-22, 2022-23 or 2023- 24. It is mandatory for the concerned association to register only such players by using this “common form”.

iii. Registered players – are those players who are registered online in t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top