IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K. SURENDER, J. ANIL KUMAR, JJ.
Kommu Anil, S/o. Shyamson- Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana - Respondent
Criminal Appeal Nos. 1029 & 1460 of 2017
Decided On : 27-02-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of the appellant's conviction and charges (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. conclusion and dismissal of the appeals. (Para 3) |
| 3. eyewitness accounts and medical evidence (Para 6 , 12) |
| 4. arguments related to lack of intent and premeditation (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. court's assessment of intent and actions of the appellant (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 6. judgment outcomes and decisions on appeals (Para 22 , 23) |
JUDGMENT :
K. Surender, J.
1. Crl.A.No.1029 of 2017 is preferred by the appellant, questioning his conviction for the offence under Section 302 of IPC. Crl.A.No.1460 of 2017 is preferred by the State with a prayer to direct that the appellant shall not be released on parole till his natural death, since he is a rowdy sheeter and a menace to the Society.
2. Since both the Appeals arise out of common judgment in S.C.No.506 of 2012, both are heard together and disposed off by way of this common judgment.
3. Heard learned counsel appearing for the appellant in Crl.P.No. 1029 of 2017 and respondent in Crl.P.No.1460 of 2017, and Sri Arun Kumar Dodla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State.
4. The case of the prosecution is that on 08.03.2012, at about 7 p.m., P.W.10 purchased pakodi from P.W.9, who is running a hotel, but P.W.10 did not make the payment, even though P.W.9 insisted. Then, P.W.8 also insisted him to make the payment. Thereafter, an altercation took place between P.W.10 and P.W.8. Since P.W.10 was threatened, he called the appellant over phone. Appellant came there and beat P.W.4, who had joined P.W.8 and questioned P.W.10 for altercating with P.W.8. Appellant also beat P.W.8, thereafter, P.W.4 called Jelloji Raju and Jelloji Naresh (deceased) over phone. P.W.4 along with the deceased went to Kisan Nagar locality and caught hold of the appellant. While they were trying to take the appellant to the Police Station, the appellant took out a knife, which was concealed under the seat of his motorcycle, and stabbed Raju, Naresh, Janagama Kamal, Bachu Shashi Kiran, Kola Srinivas/P.W.4 and Pasula Vijay/P.W.5. Jelloji Naresh (D.1) died on the spot and Jelloji Raju (D.2) died on the way to hospital, and others were taken to the hospital. While undergoing treatment, Janagama Kamal (D.3) died on 09.03.2012, and Shashi Kiran (D.4) died on 01.04.2012.
5. On receiving the information about D.1 and D.2, P.W.1, who is their mother, along with her brother-in-law, Jelloji Thirupati/P.W.2, lodged a complaint with the Police on 09.03.2012, at about 3:00 a.m. The Police took up investigation, conducted inquest over the dead bodies and obtained post mortem examination report. On 16.03.2012, the appellant was arrested at railway station, Karimnagar. Knife/M.O.15 and motorcycle/M.O.16 were seized at his instance and accordingly, charge sheet was filed, after concluding investigation.
6. P.Ws.4, 5, 6, and 7 are the eye witnesses to the incident. Apart from the 4 deceased persons, P.Ws.4 and 5 were also attacked by the appellant and they received injuries. P.Ws.4 and 5 were treated by P.W.21/Dr.T.Vidyasagar.
7. P.W.4/Srinivas was operated and discharged on 18.03.2012. He received a penetrating injury with jekunal perforation and mesenteric tear into assault, which is grievous in nature. Ex.P.16 is the medico legal certificate issued by P.W.21.
8. P.W.5/Parsula Vijay was discharged on 11.03.2012. He received a stab injury over the right thigh 5 x 4 cms, which is grievous in nature. Ex.P.17 is the medico legal certificate issued by P.W.21
8. According to P.W.21, he examined and performed operation of D.3, namely Kamal, who received the following injuries:-
“1. Stab injury in the abdomen in the left flank.
2. Left side of the chest inframmary region.
3. Left supra scapula area.
4. Massive haemothorax.
P.W.21 stated that “since condition of D.3/Kamal was serious, he was operated and left supra scapula wound entering into left effects of plural cavity, 900 ml of blood was drained out. Operation was performed and he was put
Govind Singh vs. State of Chattisgarh
The court ruled that deliberate and excessive actions during a violent altercation, resulting in multiple fatalities, establish intention and premeditation necessary for a conviction under Section 30....
The court established that sudden provocation can reduce a murder charge to culpable homicide under Section 304 if the act occurs without premeditation and in the heat of passion.
The court held that when a death occurs from a single blow in the heat of passion during a sudden quarrel, it may be classified under Section 304 IPC instead of Section 302 IPC.
The court established that a lack of premeditation and intent to kill can lead to a conviction under Section 304 IPC instead of Section 302 IPC in cases of sudden provocation.
The court established that a lack of premeditation and intention to kill in a sudden quarrel can lead to a conviction under Section 304 Part II IPC instead of Section 302 IPC.
The appellate court modified the conviction from Section 302 to Section 304 IPC, recognizing the absence of premeditation and intention to kill during a sudden altercation influenced by the accused's....
The main legal point established in the given judgment is that the appellant's act was committed on the spur of the moment, without premeditation, and without taking undue advantage or acting in a cr....
The Court modified conviction from murder to culpable homicide, applying Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC for sudden assault without premeditation.
The court modified conviction from murder to culpable homicide under Section 304 IPC, establishing that the incident arose from sudden provocation and was not premeditated.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.