Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
Abhinand Kumar Shavili, Tirumala Devi Eada
Special Deputy Collector – Appellant
Versus
A. Bhoomaiah – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. compensation for acquired land must reflect market value and surrounding utility. (Para 2 , 3 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. dispute over adequacy of compensation necessitates court intervention. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 3. final ruling maintained without alterations to previous compensation order. (Para 12 , 15) |
| 4. confirmation of trial court's findings on compensation adjustment. (Para 13 , 14) |
JUDGMENT :
Tirumala Devi Eada, J.
This appeal, under Section 54 of the LAND ACQUISITION ACT , 1894, (for short ‘the Act’) is preferred by the Special Deputy Collector, Karimnagar aggrieved by the order and decree dated 13.06.2003 passed in O.P.No.113 of 1997 by the learned Senior Civil Judge at Karimnagar (hereinafter referred to as ‘the trial Court’).
2. The appellant – Special Deputy Collector is aggrieved by the order of the trial Court enhancing the compensation from Rs.16,800/- per acre that was granted by the Land Acquisition Officer to that of Rs.1,46,000/- per acre.
3. X-Objections are filed by the respondents - claimants praying for enhancement of the market value of the acquired lands to Rs.4,00,000/-. It is their contention that the lands which were acquired are useful for residential house pu
The court upheld the trial court's enhanced compensation ruling, emphasizing that higher market values must be considered in land acquisition cases, allowing for smaller sales as indicators under pro....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
