SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Telangana) 1150

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K. SUJANA
Bonthala Ravi – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : G. Eshwaraiah

ORDER :

1. This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (for short ‘ BNSS ’) to quash the order dated 09.09.2024 passed in Crl.M.P.No.772 of 2024 in STC.NI.No.19 of 2021 by the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Bellampalli.

2. The brief facts of the case are that petitioner filed Crl.M.P.No.772 of 2024 in STC.NI.No.19 of 2021 before the trial Court under Section 45 of the Indian EVIDENCE ACT to send the cheque bearing No.000011 dated 01.07.2021 to expert at Forensic Science Laboratory, Red Hills, Hyderabad for comparison and analysis of age of ink over the signature, date and name of payee on the said cheque. The trial Court, after hearing both sides, vide order dated 09.09.2024, dismissed the petition on the ground that the age of the ink cannot be determined by any scientific method. Aggrieved by the said order, the petitioner filed the present criminal petition.

3. Heard Sri G. Eashwaraiah, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as well as Sri D. Arun Kumar, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of respondent No.1-State and Sri Rudresh Deshpande, learned counsel appearing on behalf of responde

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top