IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K. Lakshman, J
Md. Zakir Hussain – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
ORDER :
K. Lakshman, J.
Heard Mr. Alluri Raghu Rama Aurava, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. M. Durga Prasad, learned Standing Counsel for GHMC, Mr. L. Harish, learned counsel for respondent Nos.4 and 5 in W.P. No.28890 of 2024 and Mr. Pranay Sohini, learned counsel for respondent No.4 in W.P. No.8922 of 2022.
2. Lis involved and the parties i.e., petitioner and official respondents in both the writ petitions are one and the same. Therefore, both the writ petitions were heard together and the same are being disposed of by way of this common order.
3. However, for the sake of convenience, the parties are hereinafter referred to as they are arrayed in W.P. No.28890 of 2024.
4. CASE OF THE PETITIONER :
i) According to the petitioner, Mr. Nawab Kazim Nawaz Jung Bahadur and others executed a sale deed with possession in favour of Mr. M. Narsing Rao. His name was mutated in the records of then Gram Panchayat, Nacharam, Rangareddy District vide orders No.G/407/1985, dated 28.06.1985. He has obtained permission from the Revenue Department i.e., Tahsildar, Uppal Mandal, Medchal - Malkajgiri District. He has constructed an outhouse room in the said property. He also obtained election conne
Building permits obtained through misrepresentation can be revoked by the Commissioner, emphasizing the necessity for truthful declarations in property disputes.
Building permission must be obtained with full disclosure of all relevant facts, including pending litigation; failure to do so constitutes misrepresentation under Section 450 of the GHMC Act.
The court emphasized that disputes regarding building permits should follow established appeal processes rather than writ petitions, affirming procedural adherence under the Telangana Municipalities ....
Point of law: There is a presumption that public officials would discharge their duties honestly and in accordance with law. Even administrative power to be exercised to fulfill real purpose and not ....
Material misrepresentation in obtaining a building permit justifies cancellation under Section 450 of the GHMC Act.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that disputes involving property title are within the jurisdiction of civil courts, and seeking remedies under civil law is the proper course of ac....
The court noted that unauthorized construction may be regularized under existing rules if deviations are minor, requiring proper procedures for addressing complaints.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.