IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K.LAKSHMAN, J.
M/s. Fair Fields Plot Owners Welfare Association - Appellant
Vs.
The Hyderabad Metropolitan Commissioner - Respondent
Writ Petition No. 17797 of 2009
Decided On : 04-02-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. formation of a community and the earmarking of public utility land. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. claims of the gram panchayat regarding public utility construction. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. legal contest about the right to land use and authority to construct. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. violation of court orders regarding land use. (Para 15 , 19 , 21) |
| 5. court's directive for demolition and land restoration. (Para 23) |
ORDER :
1. Heard Sri V. Gopal Rao Amanacharla, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Sri V. Narsimha Goud, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent Nos.1 and 2, Sri Laxmaiah Kanchani, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent No.7. Perused the record.
2. Petitioner herein is a registered society registered under the provisions of the Telangana Societies Registration Act, 2001 vide registration No.1016 of 2009. Owners of plots/houses/villas are the members of the petitioner’s association.
3. M/s. Fair Fields, a company, developed land admeasuring Ac.7-37 gts., in Sy.Nos.1 to 6, 15, 16 and 47P of Neknampur village, Rajendranagar Mandal on obtaining permission No.16/MP/2/4/03 on 27.02.2003. It was for development of a gated community. The said company developed layout as a gated community with two model houses along with a room for the Welfare Association in plot No.29, Sy.No.1 to 6, 15, 16 and 47P, Neknampur village. The said lay out was fenced at the time of approval by obtaining necessary permission. At the time of approval by respondent No.1 – HMDA, respondent No.1 has allocated certain areas for common public utility such as park, septic tanks, overhead water tank, garbage centers, etc., in the final layout. The members of the petitioner society purchased plots from the said company under valid registered sale deeds.
4. Respondent No.1 - HMDA informed respondent No.3 - the then Gram Panchayat, Neknampur about the approval and the areas earmarked for the purpose of common public utilities such as park, septic tank, overhead water tank, garbage centers, etc. The said areas earmarked are under the control and custody of respondent No.3 - the then Gram Panchayat, Neknampur and the petitioner association since 2003.
5. It is further contended by the petitioner that the Village Secretary in collusion with the Sarpanch of Neknampur Grampanchyat is trying to encroach into the common areas earmarked for the purpose of common utility for the resident’s welfare association and is trying to create third party interest by alienating the same. Therefore, they have submitted a representation dated 12.08.2008 to all the respondents with a request to stop the said construction. They have not stopped the construction. Therefore, petitioners have filed the present writ petition to declare the action of respondent Nos.1 to 4 in not restraining respondent Nos.5 to 6 from interfering and encroaching into the common utility places earmarked for the purpose of petitioner’s association, as illegal and consequently direct the respondents to remove the structures, if any, made in the said open place earmarked for the purpose of common utility in the layout.
6. Respondent No.3 - Panchayat Secretary, the then Gram Panchyat, Neknampur filed counter admitting about the aforesaid layout issued by respondent No.1. It is contended that basing on the approved layout by the then HUDA, petitioner association has registered a gift deed in respect of four open spaces in favour of Neknampur Gram Panchayat, vide registered gift deed bearing document No.9193 of 2003, dated 10.12.2003. Thereafter, the HMDA released the said final layout. On registration of the said gift deed, the common public utility spaces, such as park, septic tanks, overhead water tank, garbage centers, etc., are vested with the Gram Panchayat. The petitioner has no right over the said public places.
7. It is also contended that the Mandal Parishad, Rajendra Nagar has proposed to construct Anganwadi building at Neknampur village. Accordingly, an amount
Dr. G.N. Khajuria and others v. Delhi Development Authority and others
Land designated for public utilities cannot be repurposed without due process and violates public trust principles, necessitating demolition of unauthorized structures.
Point of law : Section 46 of Act, it is the duty of the Gram Panchayat to provide certain amenities to the public and maintain them, such as construction of schools (clause iii), laying and maintenan....
OSR land in approved layouts for public parks cannot be sold privately; title disputes resolved in civil court, not writ jurisdiction.
Common purpose areas in a real estate layout must not be converted for other uses, reinforcing regulatory authority responsibility in protecting public purpose land.
Unauthorized construction permissions obtained through fraudulent documentation are null and void, reinforcing the principle that land designated for educational purposes cannot be unlawfully convert....
The Municipality lacks authority to initiate eviction proceedings without a gift deed for public land, confirming that prior claims do not legally restrict subsequent challenges to jurisdiction.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.