Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
N.TUKARAMJI
Athaluri Pachipala Namratha – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
ORDER:
N.TUKARAMJI, J
Heard Mr. Y. Soma Srinath Reddy, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, and Mr. M. Ramachandra Reddy, learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the respondent-State.
2. This Criminal Revision Case is filed under Sections 438 and 442 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, “the BNS S ”), assailing the order dated 04.11.2025 passed in Crl.M.P. (SR) No. 12902 of 2025 in Crime No. 98 of 2025 (Old Crime No. 152 of 2025), registered for offences punishable under Sections 61 (2), 316(2), 318(4), and 111 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short, “the BNS ”), by the learned XII Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hyderabad.
3.1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been arrayed as an accused in nine different crimes, including Crime No. 98 of 2025 of the CCS Police Station, Hyderabad. It is stated that the impugned petition was filed under Section 187 (3) of the BNSS , seeking statutory (default) bail, but was returned by the Magistrate with an office endorsement instead of being adjudicated on merits.
3.2. It is further submitted that this Court, in its common order dated 24.11.2025 in Crl.R.C. No
The right to statutory bail under Section 187(3) of the BNSS accrues upon the expiry of the statutory period without a charge sheet, starting from the first FIR registration date when related crimes ....
The right to statutory bail is inalienable once the statutory period expires for failing to file charges, irrespective of case merits.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the accused's indefeasible right to default bail under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. and the prosecutor's obligations in seeking extension of time under S....
The main legal point established is that the accused has an indefeasible right to default bail under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. and the NDPS Act, and this right should not be denied due to delays or the ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the accused's indefeasible right to default bail under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. and the obligations of the concerned Magistrate to promptly consider ....
The main legal point established is that the accused has an indefeasible right to default bail under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C., and the court must take prompt action to enforce this right, restricting t....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
