Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR
Satyanarayan Soni – Appellant
Versus
State of A.P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to cancellation of power of attorney (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. responses and counterarguments regarding registration (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. court's observations on procedure and legality (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. third respondent's actions deemed unlawful (Para 13) |
| 5. writ petition disposed of with order (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
ORDER :
Gadi Praveen Kumar, J.
When the matter was called on 12.12.2024 and again on 30.01.2025 and 30.10.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Heard learned Government Pleader for Stamps and Registration appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3. Despite issuance of notice to respondent Nos.4 and 5 through paper publication, none appeared on their behalf.
2. The present Writ Petition is filed challenging the action of the 3rd respondent i.e. the Sub-Registrar, Sanga Reddy, Medak District, in entertaining and registering cancellation of Irrevocable General Power of Attorney (IGPA) dated 26.07.2013 vide Doc.No.53/IV/2013, as illegal, arbitrary, in violation of principles of natural justice and contrary to the Circular Memo No.G.1/Can/4028/2010 dated 31.03.2010 issued by the 2nd respondent and also provisions of the Reg
The unilateral cancellation of a General Power of Attorney is invalid without a competent court's order and proper notice to affected parties.
A simple General Power of Attorney can be revoked unilaterally by the executant without the need for the agent's consent if no ownership rights are granted.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
