SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Telangana) 1692

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
J.Sreenivas Rao
State of Telangana – Appellant
Versus
Sakinala Niahesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Public Prosecutor TG

Table of Content
1. overview of the appeal and factual background. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments about evidence and prosecution's failure. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 8)
3. court's assessment standards in acquittal cases. (Para 7 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
4. conclusion affirming trial court's acquittal. (Para 13)
5. final order dismissing the appeal. (Para 14)

ORDER :

J. Sreenivas Rao, J.

This Criminal Appeal has been filed by the State aggrieved by the Judgment passed by the II Additional Sessions Judge, Warangal (‘Sessions Judge’ for brevity) in S.C.No.188 of 2015 dated 10.03.2016 whereunder the respondents-accused Nos.1 to 3 were acquitted for the offences punishable under Section 498-A, 304-B of the Indian Penal Code (‘IPC’ for brevity) and Sections 3, 4 and 6(2) of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 (‘DP’ Act for brevity).

2. Brief facts of the case:

2.1. The case of the prosecution is that on 14.02.2015, at 21.00 hours the complainant/PW.1/Agaboina Saraiah lodged a complaint stating that he has two daughters aged 20 years and 17 years respectively. The complainant is working as a Constable in Regonda Police Station. At that time his elder daughter by name Sagarika i.e., deceased victim used to attend college

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top